Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaspard v. LeMaire, 158 So. 2d 149.

655 citing documents.

Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Company 239 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
963 , (1964); , (1963), from substituting our discretion for that of the trial judge.
Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 241 So. 2d 253 La. 1970
SUMMERS, Justice, , (1963) and the cases which have applied that rule.
Koder v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 241 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Martin v. Farkas 241 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Spears v. Travelers Insurance Co. 241 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Pepper v. Glover 241 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
963 , (1964); , (1963), and we are satisfied from our review of the record that the trial court did not abuse this discretion and that the award of $1,800 general *271 damages for the injuries sustained by plaintiff and related pain and suffering is neither inadequate nor excessive.
Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 240 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
In plaintiff's application for rehearing seeking a restoration of the full amount awarded herein by the jury in the lower court, , (1963), and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 237 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 238 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Aguillard v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. 238 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Herndon v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 237 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1970
Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 237 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
These figures while they seem to us to be on the lower end of the spectrum, , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
Bennett v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 238 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
(1963).” (Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 231 So.2d at 453, 455 ) As clearly stated by this Court in Rodriguez , cited supra, the agent may not urge imputation of his negligence to his principal so as to defeat the principal’s suit against the agent, although as respects third persons, such im
Robison v. Garnett 238 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Reeder v. Allstate Insurance Company 235 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
(1963), makes it plain that each award must stand on the facts of each case, that is, upon a legally feasible relationship between the award and the evidence which supports it.
Guthrie v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana 238 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Oxley v. Allstate Insurance 237 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1963) and Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Tubbs v. Allstate Insurance Co. 238 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Strother v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 238 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Mathews v. Allstate Insurance 235 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Hathorn v. McKay 236 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
259 , , , , was not abused, see, e. g., McMillan v. Phillips, La.App.
Hutchins v. Westley 235 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Burch v. St. Louis Fire & Marine Insurance 235 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1963); Desselle v. Wilson, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1967).
Orgeron v. Earl Gibbon Transport, Inc. 235 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
that awards in personal injury cases should be measured in terms of the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case at bar and that prior awards should be looked to only insofar as they might indicate an abuse of the trial court’s discretion.
Brumfield v. Fisher 235 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Harrell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 234 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
as clarified in Ballard v. *466 National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Gant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 234 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Miller v. Weaver 234 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1970
Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 231 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Harden v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co. 234 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 234 So. 2d 754 La. 1970
981 , , on the one hand, as requiring comparison with awards in similar cases, , , Ballard et ux.
Commnita v. Jurisich 232 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Tewis v. Zurich Insurance 233 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
963 , (1964); , (1963), and we will, therefore, not disturb the award.
Meyers ex rel. Meyers v. Jefferson Parish School Board 233 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Dull v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 233 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
(1963) and in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Soileau v. Continental Insurance Company 228 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
959 , (1967) , (1963) which hold generally that the amount of an award for general damages lies largely within the great discretion of the trial court and should not be disturbed on appellate review in the absence of an abuse of discretion.
Heider v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 231 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Jones v. Lungaro 231 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Kogos v. Rittiner 228 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
963 , (1964); , (1963); Booth v. Good Foods, Inc.
Gengo v. Fereday 230 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1970
4th Cir. 1962), , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Charles v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 229 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963); Broussard v. St.
Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Followed Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 236 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Perniciaro v. Travelers Insurance Co. 227 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Porter v. Sprawls 227 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Barlow v. City of New Orleans 228 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Grauke v. Leger 227 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963) the court said “appellate courts should consider the amounts of awards in other cases only so far as they are relevant to the question of whether the judge or the jury abused its discretion * * The decision in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Levier v. American Employers Insurance Co. 228 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Greene v. Allstate Insurance 228 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, 246 La.
McGuire v. Oliver 227 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963), and in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebr., 246 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by