Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaspard v. LeMaire, 158 So. 2d 149.

655 citing documents.

Barber Brothers Contracting Company, LLC v. Capitol City Produce Company, LLC; Frank Cushenberry; And Xyz Insurance Company C/W … La. 2024
Henry Pete v. Boland Marine And Manufacturing La. 2023
3d 274, 278 ( (1963)), “[s]ince an award of damages for personal injuries is of necessity somewhat arbitrary and also must vary greatly with the facts and circumstances of each case, the trial court is entrusted with large discretion [in] making such awards .
Henry Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
So.2d 149 (1963; Ballard v. National Indem.
Kim D. Simon Versus Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and Shannon D. Singleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Nevertheless, So.2d 149 (1963) through Coco [supra], and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Shawn Copell v. Arceneaux Ford, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Christy Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Co. of Hartford, So.2d 149 (1963); Felt v. Price, 240 La.
Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Co. 229 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Co. of Hartford, Gaspard v, LeMaire, , (1963); Felt v. Price, 240 La.
Kimberly and Todd Thibodeaux, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Gabrielle Thibodeaux v. James F. Donnell, … 219 So. 3d 274 La. 2017
Aguillard v. Gregory 194 So. 3d 612 La. 2016
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Ober v. Champagne 166 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Sandra Hunter, Individually v. Christus Health Central Louisiana, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Hunter v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 137 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Deroche v. Latour 71 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nevertheless, the theme that | ñ , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
Terrance D. Andrus v. Accc Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 21 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
239, (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Hawkins v. AMERICAN CENTURY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
Bryan v. Allstate Insurance Company 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Nevertheless, the theme that emerges from Gaspare" v. LeMaire, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
McNeil v. Miller 10 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-250 , (1963); Wille v. Courtney, 06-231, p. 6 (La.App 5th C ir.
Adele Gradnigo, Et Ux. v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Gradnigo v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 6 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Amy Brossett v. Melody Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Brossett v. Howard 998 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Edwards v. Pierre 994 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Tremblay v. Allstate Insurance Company 955 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
The Court further noted, however, that " , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
Ridgeway v. Pierre 950 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."
Narcisse Thibodeaux v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 946 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Wille v. Courtney 943 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Davis v. Allstate Property & Cas. Ins. Co. 941 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Trahan v. Deville 933 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Meyer v. Tufaro 934 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Timothy Trahan v. Douglas Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Christal Suire v. Lcs Corrections Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 930 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Williams v. Roberts 930 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
Rico v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 929 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
James E. Viviano, Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Nevertheless, So.2d 149 (1963) through Coco v. Winston 13 Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb a
Viviano v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 903 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages in a particular case.
Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp. 900 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Nunez 898 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Washington v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. 886 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
(1963) Ballard v. National Indem.
Vera R. Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Nevertheless, So.2d 149 (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate cou
Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging 869 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
Craige v. Broome 869 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
Earl Lee Scott and Felicia A. Scott v. James Ray Roberts and State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
So.2d 149 (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Scott v. Roberts 856 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
Lebato v. Safeway Insurance Co. 852 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Nevertheless, the theme that emerges from Gaspard *450 v. LeMaire, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.