Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Placid Oil Company v. AM Dupont Corporation, 156 So. 2d 444.
-
Boxie v. Smith-Ruffin
979 So. 2d 539
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Dupont Corporation, , (1963).
-
Smith v. Doe
786 So. 2d 154
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Dupont Corporation, , (1963).
-
Owens v. Anderson
631 So. 2d 1313
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Dupont Corporation, , [sic 444] (1963).
- Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Levet v. Calais & Sons, Inc.
514 So. 2d 153
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Dupont Corporation, , (1963).
-
Carpenter v. Christian
496 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Dupont Corp., , (1963), they argue, the trial court is bound by the parties’ stipulation of facts and its failure to use the stipulated facts in reaching its decision is reversible error.
-
Emile M. Babst Co. v. Nichols Construction Corp.
488 So. 2d 699
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Dupont Corp., , (1963); R.J.
-
Distinguished
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. Blake
465 So. 2d 914
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
DuPont Corporation, , (1963).
- Pisarello v. Administrator's Service Corp. 464 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
RJ D'HEMECOURT PETROLEUM v. McNamara
444 So. 2d 600
La. 1983
Dupont Corporation, , (1963).
- Carter v. Carter 415 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Meares v. Pioneer Production Corp.
382 So. 2d 1009
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Smith v. Taylor, 226 La.
- Guilott v. Guilott 326 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
-
New Orleans Firefighters Ass'n Local 632 v. City of New Orleans
269 So. 2d 194
La. 1972
For example, subsection (3) provides “Lieutenants shall receive a minimum monthly salary of not less than fifteen percent above that of a fireman.” If there was ever any question about the interpretation of a basis for the minimum monthly salaries for various classifications in the fire department, it was put to rest by the stipulation of the city ( , (1963)) at the trial of the mandamus rule on July 8, 1969.
-
Champ Auto Sales, Inc. v. Savoy
207 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
and the finding contrary thereto cannot be upheld.” , (1963); Succ.
-
Bordelon v. Bordelon
180 So. 2d 855
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
( , , Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La.