Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 158 So. 2d 162.

71 citing documents.

Chauvin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 223 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App., ; Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , (1963); Alexander v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance Corp., La.App., ; Prosser, Law of Torts, 3d.
Hanchey v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 218 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1016 , (1967); , (1963).
King v. King 217 So. 2d 395 La. 1968
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , ; Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company 208 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
I think Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , (1963) sets forth the guidelines for a decision in the present case in plaintiff's favor.
Ardoin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 205 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
in which a carton of Coca-Colas fell from a display shelf and cut plaintiff’s foot, while she was shopping in the store.
Sims v. Gibson's of Denham Springs, Inc. 205 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Wiley v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 205 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
544 , (1957); , (1963); and James v. Childs, Division of Kroger Company, (La.App.
Arnold v. United States Rubber Company 203 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
In Pilie v. National Food Store of Louisiana, Inc., , (1963), our Supreme Court said "each case must be decided on its own facts and circumstances, and * * * res ipsa loquitur will not be applied unless the facts and circumstances indicate that the negligence of the defendant, rather than the negligence of others, is the most plausible explanation of the
Sigler v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company 201 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
3d Cir. 1954); (Orl.App.1947); , (1963).
Tassin v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 201 So. 2d 275 La. 1967
The defendant contends that the Court of Appeal ignored the decision of this court in Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , , to the effect that the doctrine is not applicable unless the facts and circumstances shown suggest the negligence of the defendant, rather than other factors, as the most plausible explanation of the accident.
Foggin v. General Guaranty Insurance Company 195 So. 2d 636 La. 1967
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , .
Hauth v. Iacoponelli 195 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
See Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , (1963).
Fruge v. Trahan 194 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
544 , ; Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , ; James v. Childs, Division of Kroger Company
Eversmeyer v. Chrysler Corporation 192 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Schulingkamp v. Bolton Ford Inc., La.
Veillon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 182 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
Rayner v. R. J. Jones & Sons 182 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Furthermore, res ipsa loquitur is inapplicable when it can be shown that “an inference that the accident was due to a cause other than defendant’s negligence could be drawn as reasonably as one that it was due to his negligence.” Gauthier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., 3 Cir., ; , .
Gauthier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 179 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
James v. Childs, Division of Kroger Company 166 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
A succinct statement of the applicable law regarding res ipsa loquitur is found in the concurring opinion of Justice Sanders in the recent case of Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , , at page 171, as follows: "The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence, the applicability of *79 which is to be determined at the conclusion of the trial.
Schulingkamp v. Bolton Ford, Inc. 163 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
See also Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , .
Turner v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 161 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Henderson v. Westchester Fire Insurance 161 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Able counsel for appellants contend the very recent case of Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., La., , is controlling on the issues presented herein.