Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richard, 158 So. 2d 828.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kevin Rickmon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
at 220, 255 So.2d at 747; (1963)).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.M. 156 So. 3d 1161 La. 2014
no need to resort to the Code of Criminal Procedure because the Children’s Code does in fact provide a specific procedure in Article 877 for extending the 90-day time period by requiring the party seeking an extension to make a showing of good cause.11 Moreover, Article 877 mandates a specific outcome for violation of that procedure in subsection (C), 9 -73, (La.
State of Louisiana v. John Thompson, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
[W]e held that the word “possess” “need not be defined statutorily because it has a ‘well known and commonly understood meaning.’” 679 So.2d at 1331 ( So.2d 828, 831 (1963)).
State v. Thompson 943 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
[W]e held that the word "possess" "need not be defined statutorily because it has a `well known and commonly understood meaning.'" 679 So.2d at 1331 ( , (1963)).
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The courts of this state also have affirmed that words and phrases are to be assigned their “well known and commonly understood meaning.” So.2d 828, 831 (La.1963).
State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Blanchard 776 So. 2d 1165 La. 2001
[7] In finding that the statute was not vague as to defendant's conduct, i.e., sitting in his car with two firearms under his immediate control and a controlled dangerous substance located next to him, we held that the word "possess" "need not *1170 be defined statutorily because it has a `well known and commonly understood meaning.'" 679 So.2d at 1331 ( , (1963)).
State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
State v. Defraites 449 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the court refused to consider a duplicitous indictment, stating: Raised for the first time by supplemental brief in this Court is the complaint that the indictment is duplicitous.
State v. Anthony 427 So. 2d 1155 La. 1983
15:447, 448; , (1964); State v. Hills, 241 La.
State v. Atkins 360 So. 2d 1341 La. 1978
State v. Dillon, supra ; see also, , (1963).
State v. Rheams 352 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
1168 (E.D.La.1970), aff'd, 434 F.2d 1307 (5th Cir. 1970); , (1963); State v. Turner, 178 La.
State v. Batiste 327 So. 2d 420 La. 1976
15:422(6); , (1963); Poland v. Dreyfous, 48 La.Ann.
State v. West 319 So. 2d 901 La. 1975
State v. Jackson 308 So. 2d 265 La. 1975
(1963); State v. Dillon, 260 La.
State v. Black 305 So. 2d 472 La. 1974
15:448 (1950); , (1963).
State v. Grant 295 So. 2d 168 La. 1973
State v. Womack 283 So. 2d 708 La. 1973
State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973
61 , (1969); , (1963); State v. Harris, 232 La.
State v. Hungerford 278 So. 2d 33 La. 1973
247 , (1966); , (1963); State v. Blankenship, 231 La.
State v. St. Amand 274 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
State v. Dillon 255 So. 2d 745 La. 1971
(1963); 1 State v. Paternostro, 224 La.
State v. Shaffer 257 So. 2d 121 La. 1971
State v. Barnes 245 So. 2d 159 La. 1971
223 , ; , ; State v. McIlvaine, 245 La.
State v. Kreller 233 So. 2d 906 La. 1970
61 , ; , ; State v. Harris, 232 La.
State v. White 223 So. 2d 843 La. 1969
State v. Williams 193 So. 2d 787 La. 1967
State v. Christiana 186 So. 2d 580 La. 1966
State v. Abadie 175 So. 2d 825 La. 1965
State v. Whisenant 175 So. 2d 293 La. 1965