DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jefferson v. Jefferson, 163 So. 2d 74.

16 citing documents.

  • Fruge Aquafarms, Inc. v. Robert R. Hicks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 1962), affirmed by So.2d 74 (1964).
  • Fruge Aquafarms, Inc. v. Hicks 218 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 3 Cir. 1962), affirmed by , (1964).
  • State ex rel. M.B. v. Bellamy 748 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.1992) , (1964) and stated that there is no distinction between the different methods of emancipation where procedural capacity is an issue.
  • Held v. Wilt 610 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    our Supreme Court interpreted LSA-C.C.P.
  • Savoy v. Savoy 542 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 700 (1960) provides that when an agent institutes suit on behalf of his principal his authority or qualification is presumed, “unless challenged by the defendant by the timely filing of the dilatory exception.” See, , (1964); See also, McMahon, Parties Litigant In Louisiana, 11 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Levy v. Levy 536 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Smith v. Williams 535 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Shatoska v. Whiddon 468 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1964); Cartwright v. Puissigur, 125 La.
  • Lee v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. 433 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Contario v. Contario 350 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Art. 682; , (1964); (La.App.
  • Frazer v. Day 307 So. 2d 733 La. 1975
    (1964); Cartwright v. Puissigur, 125 La.
  • Davis v. Royal-Globe Insurance Companies 223 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    In Jefferson v. Jefferson, La., , , Justice Sanders quoted at length from an article by the late Dean Henry G. McMahon in Tulane Law Review on this subject as follows: "`* * * [The] exception of want of capacity is deemed the proper and only medium of putting the authority of the plaintiff at issue whenever he appears in a representativ
  • Sutton v. Rogers 222 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
    (1964); Tolley v. Karcher, 196 La.
  • Hessler v. Travelers Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    passed on the possible conflict between the exception of no right of action which is peremptory and the exception to procedural capacity which is dilatory.
  • Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. 192 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • In re Greer 184 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966