Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bonanno, 163 So. 2d 72.

16 citing documents.

State v. Dabney 772 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
82 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989); , (1964).
State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
82 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989); , (1964).
State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
For a comprehensive history of this statute, , (1964), appeal dismissed, 380 U.S. 126 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Neal 500 So. 2d 374 La. 1987
1053 , (1966); , (1914); State v. Long, 133 La.
State v. Pruitt 449 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Phillips 365 So. 2d 1304 La. 1978
1053 , (1966) [2] ; , (1964); State v. Murry, 136 La.
State v. McCoy 337 So. 2d 192 La. 1976
State v. Bluain 315 So. 2d 749 La. 1975
State v. Lindsey, La., (1975); , (1964).
State v. Lindsey 310 So. 2d 89 La. 1975
(1964), we concluded that a similar constitutional attack on the crime against nature statute was without merit.
Sevin v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n 283 So. 2d 690 La. 1973
249 , (1961); State v. Smith, supra; , (1964), app. dismissed 380 U.S. 126 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Dardar 241 So. 2d 905 La. 1970
249 , ; , ; and State v. Cloud, 248 La.
City of Natchitoches v. State 221 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
486 , (1957); , (1964); City of New Orleans v. Kiefer, 246 La.
State v. Young 193 So. 2d 243 La. 1966
this phrase simply means “any and all carnal copulation or sexual joining and coition that is devious and abnormal because it is contrary to the natural traits and/or instincts intended by nature, and therefore does not conform to the order ordained by nature”.
State v. Young 193 So. 2d 243 La. 1966
this phrase simply means "any and all carnal copulation or sexual joining and coition that is devious and abnormal because it is contrary to the natural traits and/or instincts intended by nature, and therefore does not conform to the order ordained by nature".
State v. Cloud 176 So. 2d 620 La. 1965
(1964); State v. Vanicor, 239 La.