DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 164 So. 2d 589.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Delco 943 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    (1964), wherein serious and prejudicial error was found when the trial judge allowed two deputies, in rebuttal, to substantially repeat what they had testified to during the state's case-in-chief.
  • State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Haygood 641 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Butler 631 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Defendant's contention, , (1964), is that the State's rebuttal testimony was repetitive and constituted a repetition of negative testimony.
  • State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923)."
  • State v. Dayton 445 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    1058 , (1972), or if it unfairly places extreme weight on a part of the state's evidence which should have been introduced in the case in chief, , (1964).
  • State v. Perry 408 So. 2d 1358 La. 1982
    1058 , (1972), or if it unfairly places extreme weight on a part of the state's evidence which should have been introduced in the case in chief, , (1964)."
  • State v. Gatlin 396 So. 2d 1294 La. 1981
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923).
  • State v. Hills 354 So. 2d 186 La. 1978
    1058 , (1972), or if it unfairly places extreme weight on a part of the state's evidence which should have been introduced in the case in chief, , (1964)."
  • State v. Roach 338 So. 2d 621 La. 1976
    (1964), in which we found prejudicial error in the trial court's refusal to grant defendant's motion for bill of particulars; its permitting the State to recall two deputy sheriffs to repeat negative testimony which they had given in chief; its permitting the assistant district attorney to relate to th
  • State v. Turner 337 So. 2d 455 La. 1976
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923).
  • State v. Snoddy 332 So. 2d 800 La. 1976
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923).
  • State v. Whatley 320 So. 2d 123 La. 1975
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923).
  • State v. Banks 307 So. 2d 594 La. 1975
    1058 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 633 (1923).
  • State v. Jackson 307 So. 2d 604 La. 1975
  • State v. Hillman 298 So. 2d 746 La. 1974
  • State v. Woodruff 281 So. 2d 95 La. 1973
    2562 , 33 L.Ed.2d 706 (1972); , (1964).
  • State v. Wright 205 So. 2d 381 La. 1967
    905 , ; , ; State v. Sercovich, 246 La.