Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Home Gas & Fuel Co. v. Mississippi Tank Co., 166 So. 2d 252.

20 citing documents.

Philip Cash, Glenda Cash, and Philip's Family Pharmacy, Inc. v. Delhi Office Building, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 855 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Knockum v. Amoco Oil Company 402 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Based on these violations and the servicing of the system by Amoco, plaintiffs are contending that the defendants were negligent per se in accordance with the case of Home Gas & , (1964).
Williams v. Trawick 393 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Home Gas & , (1964); Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Wallace v. Pan American Fire & Cas. Co. 352 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
In Home Gas & , a case concerning LPG, the Louisiana Supreme Court said: "Moreover, the jurisprudence of this State has recognized the greater and higher than ordinary degree of care demanded of those involved in the manufacture, preparation and distribution of propane-butane gas and similar products.
Hall v. Woods 294 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In one of the latest discussions on the subject of proximate cause, the Supreme Court in Home Gas & , , said: “To be actionable the cause need not be the sole cause, but it must be a cause in fact, and to be a cause in fact it must have a proximate relation to the harm which occurs and it must be substantial in character.” In Larkins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 905 La. 1973
(1964); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Town of Ville Platte 269 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
1 Cir. 1966); Home Gas & , (1964); Harris Drilling Co. v. Delafield, 222 La.
Clarke v. Black 260 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2d Cir. 1940); Home Gas & , (1964); (La.App.
Leake v. Prudhomme Truck Tank Service, Inc. 258 So. 2d 358 La. 1972
Home Gas & , (1964); Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Co., 244 La.
Miller Car Washes, Inc. v. Crowe 245 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
These general principles were recognized in Home Gas & , (1964), which was an action by a purchaser of a propane-butane tank against a seller thereof for damages caused by a fire resulting from the accidental discharge of gas from a tank.
Carlysle v. Aetna Insurance Co. 248 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In the case of Home Gas & , (1964), the Supreme Court found that a violation of these Rules and Regulations constituted actionable negligence per se, if the violation was the proximate cause of an accident resulting therefrom.
Farris v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 242 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1041 , , , , 255: “To be actionable the cause need not be the sole cause, but it must be a cause in fact, and to be a cause in fact, it must have a proximate relation to the harm which occurs and it must be substantial in character”.
Merwin v. D. H. Holmes Co. 223 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
810 , (1946) and Home Gas & , (1964), involving highly dangerous products, which used tort-negligence theories to recognize a cause of action against manufacturer-vendors for damgaes caused by the defects in their products.
Ruthardt v. Tennant 215 So. 2d 805 La. 1968
In Home Gas & , we said: “To be actionable the cause need not be the sole cause, but it must be a cause in fact, and to be a cause in fact it must have a proximate relation to the harm which occurs and it must be substantial in character.” Since Tennant’s negligence operated continuously to the moment of the collision
American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Tyler 210 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
“It is elementary that negligence is not actionable unless it constitutes a proximate cause of the injury sued upon, Home Gas & , ; Bodan v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, La.App., , or as stated by the Supreme Court in Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Company, et al., 242 La.
Hoover v. Wagner 189 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
It is elementary that negligence is not actionable unless it constitutes a proximate cause of the injury sued upon, Home Gas & , ; Bodan v. American Employers' Insurance Company, La.App., , or as stated by the Supreme Court in Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Company, et al., 242 La.
Lee v. Peerless Insurance Company 183 So. 2d 328 La. 1966
Home Gas & , ; Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Scott v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 176 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Home Gas & , (1964) ; Perkins v. Texas And New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Lee v. Carwile 168 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
iff-appellant contends, that, "when the negligence of the defendant greatly multiplies the chances of harm to plaintiff, and is of a character naturally leading to its occurrence, `the mere possibility that it might have happened without the negligence is not sufficient to break the chain of cause and effect between the negligence and the injury.'" Home Gas & , .