Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glisson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, 165 So. 2d 289.

18 citing documents.

Thalia Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
App. 3 Cir. 1963), aff’d
Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. 193 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir.1963), aff'd, , (1964).
Davis v. Canadian National Railway 137 So. 3d 11 La. 2014
Lindsay v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 798 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
the Supreme Court held: The general rule of law is that a motorist approaching a railroad crossing must use | (¿lis senses of sight and hearing for possible oncoming trains, before traversing the crossing.
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
LeJeune v. Union Pacific RR 712 So. 2d 491 La. 1998
Rivere v. Union Pacific R. Co. 647 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Richard v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 536 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
(1964), the court stated: "The general rule of law is that a motorist approaching a railroad crossing must use his senses of sight and hearing for possible oncoming trains, before traversing the crossing.
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lagrange v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 503 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Henderson, supra; , (1964).
Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 393 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
(1964), from a point 48 feet from the track had a clear view for 380 feet and a partially obstructed view for at least 600 feet down the track, and was held to be contributorily negligent in failing to see an approaching train.
Green v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. 369 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1963); Affirmed , .
Odom v. Hooper 273 So. 2d 510 La. 1973
(1964), is the only recent expression of this court sometimes cited in support of an artificially high duty of motorists to observe trains at crossings.
Freeman v. Vines 262 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
McCray v. Illinois Central Railway Co. 244 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
875), affirmed , ; (3rd La.App.1964), writ refused 245 La.
Theriot v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. 220 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Carlin v. Illinois Central Railroad 210 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In Glisson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, La.App., , , (June 8, 1964) the court stated: “The general rule of law is that a motorist approaching a railroad crossing must use his senses of sight and hearing for possible oncoming trains, before traversing the crossing.
Mediamolle v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad 169 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964