Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Algiers Homestead Association v. Brown, 167 So. 2d 349.

16 citing documents.

Gaudin Equipment & Supply Co. v. Administrator, Louisiana Department of Labor 534 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The purpose of the various disqualification provisions found in the law governing unemployment compensation “is to make sure that compensation is not paid to those who choose not to work, that the compensation law does not encourage idleness, and that it does not weaken the willingness of the individual to provide for himself through employment.” , (1964).
South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. DEPT. OF LABOR, OFFICE OF EMP. SECURITY 527 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-351 (1964), appears the following: The broad purpose of the unemployment compensation acts which have been adopted by various states is to provide a measure of economic security to those who are unemployed because industry does not provide enough jobs to employ all those available for, and seeking
Craighead v. ADMINISTRATOR OF ETC. 420 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Martin Mills, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security 391 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Our Supreme Court, , (1964) ( (La.
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Department of Employment Security 389 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the court found that although pregnancy is a good cause for leaving one’s employment, it is not a good cause connected with employment.
Hale v. Gerace 324 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Grape v. Brown 231 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1946) were cited and relied on as controlling.
King v. Louisiana Department of Employment Security 229 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(b) in 1968 was meant to override legislatively the decision relied upon by the trial court in its determination, namely, Al *389 , (1964).
Sandifer v. Administrator, Department of Employment Security 222 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
* * * » It is appellee’s , (1964) is controlling in the instant case and is authority for the judgment of the lower court.
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 211 So. 2d 634 La. 1968
in the case, “when an employee leaves her employment pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement because of pregnancy and after giving birth to the child attempts *523 to return to her employment, has she left her employment for good cause connected with her employment, * * * has been passed upon adversely to claimant in the following cases: , (1964) ; Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. Brown (La.App.
Distinguished Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 203 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1964), is also distinguishable from the instant case in that the employee there was never granted a leave of any kind.
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 203 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
This issue has been presented to the appellate courts of this state before, and on each occasion it has been held that pregnancy constitutes a “good cause” for leaving the employment, but that it is not a cause “connected with the employment.” Algiers Homestead Association v. Brown, *752 , (1964); Southern Bell T. & T. Co. v. Administrator, Div. of E. S. & Josephine Tullier, (La.App.
Neal v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 197 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
689 , (1965); , (1964); Sheffield v. Heard (La.App.)
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 197 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Brown 188 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
* * * a We think the recent case of Algiers Homestead Association v. Brown, Administrator of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, , (1964) is controlling.
Hargrove v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security 166 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Algiers Homestead Ass’n v. Brown, La., (rendered July 1, 1964), reversing La.App., ; Gladson v. Brown, La.App., 3 Cir., ; Baker v. Sharp, La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by