DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., 169 So. 2d 50.

75 citing documents.

  • Victoria Roach v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    23 989, (1971); So.2d 50 (1964).
  • Starr v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 70 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Illinois, , Bullard, supra.
  • Thomas v. Hodges 48 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    ( Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, -43 , (1964)).
  • Bullard v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 744 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964).
  • Owens v. Anderson 631 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, III., , (1964); (La.
  • Theriot v. Lasseigne 624 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    4th Cir., 1989); Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill.
  • Shroyer v. Grush 555 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964); (La.App.
  • Molbert v. Toepfer 550 So. 2d 183 La. 1989
  • Hano v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 519 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Simon v. Ford Motor Company, supra ; Jones v. Continental Casualty Company Of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964).
  • Siemann v. Teston 517 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Levet v. Calais & Sons, Inc. 514 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964); (La.
  • Paige v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 512 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Townley v. Manuel 509 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    989 , (1971); , (1964)."
  • Collins v. Sonnier 488 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964).
  • Malmay v. Sizemore 474 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Ryan v. State 477 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964); (La.App.
  • Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Everett v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    989 , (1971), rehearing denied, June 28, 1971; , (1964); (La.
  • Jordan v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance 416 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • McIntosh v. MONROE MUN. FIRE, ETC. 389 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    In Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964), the Supreme Court upheld a finding of intoxication, stating that "the alcoholic content of the driver's blood (.11 percent) was sufficient to establish that he was intoxicated and that his mental and physical faculties were materially impaired ..."
  • Powell v. Heck 378 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Free v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 377 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Barnes v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964); Rizley v. Cutrer, 232 La.
  • Prestenbach v. Sentry Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 1331 La. 1976
  • Prestenbach v. Sentry Insurance 329 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    989 , ; Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , ; Magee v. McCree, La.App., ; Church v. Allstate Insurance Co., La.App., 242 So.
  • Richard v. American Home Assurance Company 318 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    In Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964), a blood test of the driver of one of the vehicles involved in the accident revealed that he had a blood alcohol content of .11 percent, and the coroner stated that that was sufficient to cause him to be intoxicated.
  • Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Trailer Mfg. Co. 312 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    23 , (1963); Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964).
  • Tillman v. Canal Insurance Co. 305 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Co. of Chicago, , (1964); (La.App.
  • Page v. Green 306 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    23 , (1963); Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964).
  • Johnson v. McKay 306 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    1973); Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964); (La.App.
  • Dewese v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Defendant-appellant in brief relies heavily on the case of Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964).
  • McIntyre v. Poole 293 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Gruber v. Beeson, La.App., ; Lemmon v. Babb, La.App., ; Walker v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, La.App., ; Roller v. Cormier, La.App., ; Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , ; Otis v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ; McAlister v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.
  • Gruber v. Beeson 284 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964).
  • Simon v. Ford Motor Company 282 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964); Rizley v. Cutrer, 232 La.
  • Magee v. McCree 278 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    or should have been known to the guest passenger, constitutes not only an assumption of the risk in any claim against his host but also independent, contributory negligence sufficient to bar his recovery from third persons in any case where the host driver was guilty of negligence which was a proximate cause of the accident.” In the case of Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Ill., , our Supreme Court, citing Otis v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., supra; and Grayson v. Allstate
  • Berry v. Travelers Insurance Co. 273 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Johnson v. Allstate Insurance 254 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    *94 , , (1964) as support for their position that the driver of the Mustang was intoxicated, and that the guest passengers knew or should have known of his intoxication so as to defeat any recovery by their heirs in a subsequent damage suit.
  • Phillips v. Blossman 252 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1964).” However, the trial judge denied plaintiff’s recovery on the grounds of contributory negligence on thé part of young Phillips.
  • Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Company 249 So. 2d 105 La. 1971
  • Young v. All American Assurance Company 243 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    (1964) and the cases cited therein.
  • Costen v. Hirschbach Motor Line 239 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , (1964); (La.App.
  • Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Therefore the driver has done no actionable wrong to his guest because the guest has somehow consented to the driver’s conduct.” Furthermore, , 169 So.2d SO, the Court said: “Under the above facts and circumstances, we believe that the defendants have borne their burden of proving the contributory negligence of plaintiffs’ son and the other two guest passengers.
  • Sanders v. National Surety Corp. 230 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Illinois, , (1946).
  • Hidalgo v. Thomas 229 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Dean v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App.
  • Normand v. Hertz Corporation 229 So. 2d 104 La. 1969
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , (1964); Mercier v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
  • Matthews v. All American Assurance Company 226 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Freeman v. New York Fidelity & Casualty Co. 224 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Ill., , (1964) and the cases cited therein; Daigle v. United States Fideli *560 ty & Guaranty Company, La.App., (3rd Cir.1966); Roller v. Cormier, La.App., (3rd Cir.1966); Brown v. Collins, La.App., (3rd Cir.1969).
  • Lemmon v. Babb 219 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    We believe that defendants have born the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the mental and physical faculties of Huddleston were materially impaired.” In applying the doctrine of assumption of risk, , ; and Barnebuy v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Perry v. Herrin 215 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    655 , ; Davis v. Roberts, La.App., ; Jones v. Continental Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois, , ; Daniel v. Reed, La.App., .
  • Sanders v. Eilers 217 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill., , ; Bogasky v. Falsetta, La.App., .