Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Tucker, 170 So. 2d 371.

14 citing documents.

R.T. Faulk, III, Corey Farms, L.L.C. Faulk Farms, Incorporated Joanne Hodges River Valley Properties McHenry Farms, L.L.C. Sherman … La. 2015
Art. I, § 23 (“No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be enacted.”); State, Department of Highways, So.2d 371 (La.
Robert Wayne Hackett, Et Ux. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co., USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hackett v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA 158 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State Through Dep’t , (1964).
Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. 823 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
The trial court, relying on the supreme court's opinion in State, , (1964), found the limits of the tracts stopped at the south right-of-way line of the public road; and, as a consequence, Sophie Crow retained ownership of the portion of the road located south of the section line.
Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. 824 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
(1964), and followed in the reasons for judgment in docket no. 96-2277, it is concluded that in the above sale Clara Beraud did not convey any portion of the road recited to be the South boundary (now Dulles Road), and she retained whatever part of the roadbed she owned.
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc. 770 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
9:2971 (Act 555 of 1956), and the case is State v. Tucker, [ ,]
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc. 763 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Such a holding would be contrary to all the Louisiana jurisprudence addressing that issue, including [ State v. ] Tucker [, , ] specifically.
Dunbar v. Benoit 494 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
highway, road, street, alley, or other right-of-way, shall be held, deemed and construed to include of grantor’s interest in and under such waterway, canal, highway, road, street, alley, railroad, or other right-of-way, whatever that interest may be, in the absence of any express provision therein particularly excluding the same therefrom; ...” In State, , (1964), however, our Supreme Court held that the statute cannot be applied retroactively.
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Heck 407 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Garrett v. Pioneer Production Corp. 390 So. 2d 851 La. 1980
State of Louisiana, , (1965).
Garrett v. Pioneer Production Corp. 378 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
306 , (1947); State, , (1965).
Culligan Water Conditioning, Inc. v. Heirs of Watson 370 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Co., No. 141,560 (1960), which holding was acknowledged in State, , (1964).
Cornish v. Kinder Canal Company 267 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Levraea v. Boudreaux 259 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
the Supreme Court held that R.S.