DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board, 168 So. 2d 595.

29 citing documents.

  • Succession of Marilyn Vaughn Smith Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    of New Orleans, So.2d 595, 597 (1964).
  • Succession of Phillips 120 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    of New Orleans, , (1964).
  • Mooring Financial Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan v. Mitchell 15 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    of New Orleans, , (1964).
  • Smith v. LeBlanc 966 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    of New Orleans, , (1964).
  • Ryder v. Belgard 915 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, [ ,]
  • Estelle Wiggins Gunter Ryder v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes
  • Caldwell Wholesale Co. v. Central Oil & Supply Corp. 761 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964).
  • Roach v. Pearl 673 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, [ ]
  • American Bank & Trust Co. v. Hannie 568 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Bd., , (1964); McClelland v. Security Indus.
  • Knight v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 566 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra ; Pontchartrain Park Homes
  • Viso v. Favie 502 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964); Webb v. Polk Chevrolet, Inc., (La.App.
  • Gilbert v. Pearson 478 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964); Brigot's Heirs v. Brigot, 47 La.Ann.
  • Brown v. Brown 473 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans [ ]
  • Mouton v. Vallot 415 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans [ ], (1964).
  • Webb v. Polk Chevrolet, Inc. 415 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964).
  • LeGlue Buick, Inc. v. Smith 390 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, (La.
  • Louisiana Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge v. Heindel 365 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Bd., (La.
  • Arender v. Gilbert 343 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    In Hancock , the court quoted at length from the decision of our Supreme Court in Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Board, , .
  • Marie v. Doucette 328 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board, , (1964)
  • Nethken v. Nethken 307 So. 2d 563 La. 1975
    Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964); Caldwell v. Caldwell, 164 La.
  • Charles X. Miller, Inc. v. Oak Builders, Inc. 306 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    [2] Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Bd., , (1964).
  • Makar v. Ivy 291 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Bd., , (1964); (La.App.
  • Hancock v. Lincoln American Life Insurance Co. 278 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    in Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Board, , , our Supreme Court set out the elements of accord and satisfaction as follows: `In order to maintain a plea of estoppel based on the doctrine of accord and satisfaction there must be present: (1) an unliquidated or a disputed claim; (2) a tender by the debtor; and (3) an acceptance of the tender by th
  • Licoho Enterprises, Inc. v. Succession of Champagne 270 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1964), the applicable law was set forth as follows : “Since the prior judgment involved herein was at the most merely voidable and not absolutely void (it was not attended with any vices of form and the court was clearly vested with jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties), and there hav
  • Young v. White Stores, Inc. 269 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    See Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, , (1964); Davis-Wood Lumber Company v. Farnsworth & Company, 171 So.
  • Work Clothes Rental Service Co. v. Dupont Manufacturers, Inc. 262 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    3 Cir. 1971); Pontchartrain Park Homes, , (1964).
  • Linda Mercantile Corporation v. Bowers 230 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    We note that in Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Board, , , our Supreme Court set out the elements of accord and satisfaction as follows: "In order to maintain a plea of estoppel based on the doctrine of accord and satisfaction there must be present: (1) an unliquidated or a disputed claim; (2) a tender by the debtor; and (3) an acceptance of the tender by th
  • National Screen Service Corp. v. Joy Theatres, Inc. 231 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    See Pontchartrain Park Homes v. Sewerage & Water Bd., , (1964) ; Burnett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile *421 Ins.
  • Muller v. Landry 170 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    In view of our holding that mandamus and injunction are unavailable to relator in this situation, it is unnecessary to discuss the case of Pontchartrain Park Homes, , relied on by relator.