Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lee v. Smith, 176 So. 2d 413.
-
Moreno v. Simonton
779 So. 2d 887
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
(1965), however, the supreme court stated: When an employer invokes the defense that the injured employee deliberately failed to use an adequate guard of protection against accident provided for him, the employer bears the burden of proving that the safety device was provided as such, that the employee
-
Allen v. Louisiana Wood Moulding Corp.
706 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
(1965); King v. Grand Cove Nursing Home, 93-779 (La.App.
-
Mitchell v. AT & T
660 So. 2d 204
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
(1965); Green v. Con Agra, supra.
- Green v. Conagra Broiler Co. 651 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- King v. Grand Cove Nursing Home 640 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
Lewis v. Teacher's Pet, Inc.
621 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir. 1981), writ denied, , (1965).
- Brazley v. Burger King/CIGNA 613 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Shelvin v. Waste Management, Inc. 580 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
Polk v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co.
578 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., (La.App.
-
Brown v. Manville Forest Products Corp.
565 So. 2d 496
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., (La.App.
-
Ross v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
556 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Edwards v. Hartford Ins.
- Jim Walter Homes v. Lewis 544 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
Wills v. Solida Const. Co.
543 So. 2d 1365
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
23:1201.2; , (1965); Harrison v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., (La.App.
- Lupo v. State, Division of the Administration, Office of Risk Management 531 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Culotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea 524 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
Fontenot v. Schlumberger Well Service
503 So. 2d 1109
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
(1965); Thibodeaux v. Dresser Industries, Inc., (La.App.
- Hodges v. Sentry Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Scott v. Ins. Co. of North America
485 So. 2d 50
La. 1986
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Harrison v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
-
Levitz Furniture Corp. v. Horne
477 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(1965) states that whether the discontinuance of compensation payments was arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause depends primarily upon facts existing and known to the employer at the time payments were stopped.
-
Lamette v. Morrison Assur. Co.
461 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., (La.App.
-
Harrison v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
446 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(1965); Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., (La.App.
- Edwards v. Hartford Ins. Co. 445 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- Kargar v. Chashoudian 432 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Celestin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
430 So. 2d 1263
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1965); Thibodeaux v. Dresser Industries, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cloud v. State
420 So. 2d 1259
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
and Thibodeaux v. Dresser Industries, Inc., (La.App.
-
Thibodeaux v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
407 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1965); De Jean v. B. F. Trappey's Sons, Inc., (La.
-
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
406 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
(1965); DeJean v. B. F. Trappey's Sons, Inc., (La.App.
- Vickers v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 383 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Rushing v. STATE THROUGH LA. HEALTH, ETC.
381 So. 2d 1250
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1965) in the context of a workmen's compensation case further states that deliberate implies more than mere negligence or a voluntary and intentional failure to use guard or protection.
-
Richard v. Standard Fittings
379 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
King v. Insurance Company of North America, La.App., ."
-
Zachary v. Bituminous Cas. Corp.
371 So. 2d 1249
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1963) , (1965).
- Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 342 So. 2d 664 La. 1977
- Crooks v. Southern Casualty Insurance 337 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Basco v. State of La., Dept. of Corrections
335 So. 2d 457
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
King v. Insurance Company of North America, La.App., .
-
Roberson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
316 So. 2d 22
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(1965); writ denied (1974).
- Griffin v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Company 316 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
- Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Company 294 So. 2d 215 La. 1974
- King v. Insurance Co. of North America 288 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Carroll v. Southern Casualty Insurance Company 285 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
- Arthur v. McConnell 286 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
- Reason v. Joan of Arc Company 285 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- De Jean v. BF Trappey's Sons, Inc. 285 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
Roberie v. Ashy Construction Company
215 So. 2d 857
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Martin v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., (1st Cir. 1967); , (1965).