Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barksdale, 170 So. 2d 374.

39 citing documents.

State v. Groves 311 So. 2d 230 La. 1975
State v. Monroe 305 So. 2d 902 La. 1974
State v. Moore 302 So. 2d 284 La. 1974
(1965) and cases cited therein.
State ex rel. Hughes v. Henderson 295 So. 2d 814 La. 1974
State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
State v. Russell 292 So. 2d 681 La. 1974
(1965); State v. Clark, 242 La.
State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
521 , (1969); , (1964); State v. Straughan, 229 La.
State v. Womack 283 So. 2d 708 La. 1973
State v. Allen 273 So. 2d 504 La. 1973
State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
State v. Brevelle 270 So. 2d 852 La. 1972
State v. Bailey 261 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
(1965); State v. Hunter, 250 La.
State v. Bailey 261 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
(1965); State v. Hunter, 250 La.
State v. Thomas 257 So. 2d 406 La. 1972
State v. Cripps 250 So. 2d 382 La. 1971
(1965): No such evidence was offered by appellants and we find absolutely no ground for complaint.
State v. Millsap 248 So. 2d 324 La. 1971
State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
(1965) and State v. Sevin, 243 La.
State v. Elie 241 So. 2d 515 La. 1970
State v. Alexander 233 So. 2d 891 La. 1970
State v. Pratt 233 So. 2d 883 La. 1970
Under the circumstances, , (Cert.
State v. Copeland 229 So. 2d 710 La. 1969
The identical issue posed here was adjudicated adversely to counsel’s , , wherein this court observed, “These (jury commissioners) are appointive offices filled by the governor and judges, respectively, based upon their evaluation of the qualification of the individual appointee,” and held, “The absence of Negroes in those offices * * is not evidence of systematic discrimi
State v. Hudson 221 So. 2d 484 La. 1969
State v. Whitfield 219 So. 2d 493 La. 1969
State v. Shilow 215 So. 2d 828 La. 1968
2043 ; , , cert, denied 382 U.S. 921 , 86 S.Ct.
State Ex Rel. Barksdale v. Dees 211 So. 2d 318 La. 1968
State v. Marks 211 So. 2d 261 La. 1968
by reason of their occupation and those persons with a “criminal record.” The contention that the indictment should have been quashed because no member of the Negro race was serving on the jury commission that selected the general venire from which the grand jury that indicted the defendant was drawn was adversely decided to defendant’s , , and also by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in Stewart v. State, 237 Ark.
State v. Vernon 208 So. 2d 690 La. 1968
970 , 2 L.Ed.2d 991 , the jury commission and judges of Orleans Parish have, , (1964), cert.
State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
State v. Andrus 199 So. 2d 867 La. 1967
State v. Hunter 195 So. 2d 273 La. 1967
State v. Howard, 243 La.
State v. Johnson 192 So. 2d 135 La. 1966
We will note this issue only briefly for these motions and the stipulation of facts upon which they are predicated are the same as those we recently considered in two other Orleans Parish cases: , (1965) and State v. Simpson, 247 La.
State v. Cooper 190 So. 2d 86 La. 1966
Again, in 1965, the constitutionality of the short form indictment as a , (1965) involving a prosecution for aggravated rape under the short form and State v. Moody, 247 La.
State v. Ceaser 187 So. 2d 432 La. 1966
State v. Brown 186 So. 2d 576 La. 1966
By stipulation between counsel for the defendant and for the State, , .
State v. Bourg 182 So. 2d 510 La. 1966
(1965); State v. Mills, 229 La.
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
The allegations of discrimination in selecting juries in Orleans Parish made in this motion present the same issues considered by this court in State v. Barksdale (January, 1965), , .
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
The allegations of discrimination in selecting juries in Orleans Parish made in this motion present the same issues considered by this court in State v. Barksdale (January, 1965), , .
State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965
State v. Barksdale, La., (1965).
State v. Clifton 172 So. 2d 657 La. 1965