DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pitre v. Pitre, 172 So. 2d 693.

21 citing documents.

  • Robinson v. Robinson 778 So. 2d 1105 La. 2001
  • McCarroll v. McCarroll 701 So. 2d 1280 La. 1997
    [3] Although the issue was not raised in this litigation and we need not reach it because of our disposition of this case on lesionary grounds, , (1965), at this juncture.
  • Brown v. Brown 680 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    the court held: Since under the Louisiana community property system the husband during the marriage has the management and control of the community property, one-half of which belongs to the wife, he as the managing partner is in a position to know relevant facts concerning this property which his wife does
  • Theriot v. Theriot 622 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    (1965) defined the duty of the husband as head and master of the community as follows: Thus when the marriage is dissolved and the community property is to be partitioned, he stands in a fiduciary relationship toward his wife and owes to her the duty of full disclosure of the community property an
  • Due v. Due 560 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NOS. 1 AND 2 , (1965), the Supreme Court left no doubt that the husband as head and master of the community owes a duty to account to his wife upon the dissolution of the community, when the court said: "Thus when the marriage is dissolved and the community property is to be partitioned, he [husband] stands in a
  • Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
    1, 1980); , (1965); Humphreys v. Royal, 215 La.
  • Distinguished Bourque v. Vinturella 525 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    (1965), in support of her argument.
  • Steadman v. Steadman 423 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    App. 3rd Cir.1964), affirmed , (1965)."
  • Bedwell v. Bedwell 399 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    3rd Cir. 1964), affirmed , (1965).
  • Rivers v. Rivers 381 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    The duty a , (1965): Since under the Louisiana community property system the husband during the marriage has the management and control of the community property, one-half of which belongs to the wife, he as the "managing partner" is in a position to know relevant facts concerning this property which his wife does
  • Watkins v. Watkins 376 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    3d Cir. 1964); , (1965).
  • Ogden v. Ogden 331 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Smith v. Succession of Smith 298 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Hodson v. Hodson 292 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    -695 (1965): "In this state the husband is the head and master of the partnership or community *836 of gains; he administers its effect and even disposes of the revenues which they produce, and may even alienate them, without the consent and permission of the wife.
  • Gay v. Martinolich 271 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Troxler v. Troxler 255 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Whittington v. Whittington 229 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The obligations of the husband as a fiduciary, , (1965), were not violated by defendant.
  • Liebendorfer v. Gayle 217 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Nelson v. Walker 197 So. 2d 619 La. 1967
  • Pitre v. Pitre 183 So. 2d 307 La. 1966
  • Pitre v. Pitre 182 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965