Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Grimble v. Brown, 171 So. 2d 653.

13 citing documents.

City of Monroe v. Tolliver 954 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-56 (1965), the supreme court stated: The Court of Appeal, relying on the Smith[ v. Brown, (La.App.
Landry v. Shell Oil Co. 597 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Atlas Processing v. ADMINISTRATOR, DES 584 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Sensley v. Administrator, Office of Employment Security 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The term, “connected with employment," is given a broader definition than the term, “in the course of employment.” , -56 , c ert.
Sensley v. ADM'R, OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Marine Drilling Co. v. Whitfield 535 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Mattox v. ADM'R, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SEC., DEPT. OF LABOR 528 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
[Emphasis theirs] , cert.
Moore v. Louisiana State University 517 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Grimble v. Brown, 247 La.376, (1965), cert.
South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Sumrall 414 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Our attention has been directed specifically to the decisions in *878 , (1965) cert.
Schoennagel v. Louisiana Office of Employment 413 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Concerning the allegation of misconduct, , (1965), Louisiana courts had held acts of misconduct committed while the employee was off duty were in no way connected with his employment and therefore could not be used to disqualify the employee under § 1601(2).
Johnson v. Bd. of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans 348 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Grimble v. Brown, etc., et al., , (1965); Jackson v. Doyal, etc., et al., La.
Jackson v. Doyal 231 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Hall v. Doyal 191 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
See also: , ; Rawls v. Brown, La.App.