Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doucet v. Insurance Company of North America, 302 So. 2d 731.
-
Graham v. Sequoya Corp.
468 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1977), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Procell v. Insurance Co. of North America
425 So. 2d 860
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
4 Cir.1977), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Rodriguez v. Brown & Root, Inc.
410 So. 2d 325
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
App. 4th Cir. 1976); (La.App.
-
Miller v. Board of Directors of the Firemen's Pension & Relief Fund
378 So. 2d 973
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
4th Cir. 1976); (La.App.
-
Briley v. Falati
367 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[1] The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Travelers, (La.App.
- Butler v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. 356 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
-
In re the Commitment of Askew
359 So. 2d 227
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1975); (La.App.
- Legendre v. Rodrigue 358 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
-
Green v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
352 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
4th Cir. 1976); (La.App.
-
Whitten v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
353 So. 2d 1071
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
"A finding that the 1972 amendment rather than the 1974 amendment governed was also a (La.App.
- O'BANION v. Allstate Ins. Co. 347 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
Phillips v. Barraza
349 So. 2d 347
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
App. 3rd Cir., 1975); (La.App.
- Walker v. Landry 336 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Fontenot v. Guillory 327 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
-
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
328 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
certiorari denied La., , we held: "We do not find the 1974 amendment to the law regulating uninsured motorist coverage to be remedial or curative as these terms are used in our jurisprudence..
- Raggio v. Volkswagen Insurance Co. 327 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
-
Paul v. Edwards
323 So. 2d 488
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
The general rule in Louisiana, both constitutional and statutory, is that laws have prospective and not retrospective operation; (La.App.
- Richard v. Zurich Insurance Company 318 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
-
Nolker v. Wallace
317 So. 2d 4
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
22:1406(D)(2)(b) [1] (before its 1974 amendment, inasmuch as the accident herein occurred on June 15, 1974, which was prior to the effective date of said amendment, i. e. July 31, 1974) (La.App.
- Doucet v. Insurance Co. of North America 305 So. 2d 134 La. 1974