Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 169 So. 2d 894.

22 citing documents.

State v. Campechano 956 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(1964), the court held a motion to quash will not lie on the ground that the accused was denied a speedy trial.
Overruled State v. Davis 677 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the supreme court held that a motion to quash was not the proper method for alleging a speedy trial violation.
State v. Montgomery 659 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
(1964), the court held a motion to quash will not lie on the ground that the accused was denied a speedy trial.
State v. Barnes 648 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
(1964), the court held a motion to quash will not lie on the ground that the accused was denied a speedy trial.
State v. Killion 483 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
a trial judge told the jury that he had found the confession to have been freely and voluntarily made, but immediately admonished the jury that it would be "entitled to hear and determine in its own mind the import," of what the defendant had intended to say.
State v. Reaves 376 So. 2d 136 La. 1979
State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
State v. Searle 339 So. 2d 1194 La. 1976
183 , (1970) (armed robbery); , 169 So.
State v. Hammler 312 So. 2d 306 La. 1975
See, , (1964) and cases cited therein.
State v. Gaspard 301 So. 2d 344 La. 1974
1085 , (1968); , (1964).
State v. McQueen 278 So. 2d 114 La. 1973
62 , (1965); , (1965); State v. Pace, 183 La.
State v. Isaac 260 So. 2d 302 La. 1972
62 , (1964); , (1964); State v. Shelby, 215 La.
State v. Nelson 259 So. 2d 46 La. 1972
183 , (1970); , (1964); and State v. Pace, 183 La.
State v. Braxton 241 So. 2d 763 La. 1970
15:432, , and State v. Odom, 247 La.
State v. Dupree 235 So. 2d 408 La. 1970
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
State v. Augustine 215 So. 2d 634 La. 1968
State v. Welch 198 So. 2d 902 La. 1967
747 ; State v. White, *725 , .
State v. Reese 194 So. 2d 729 La. 1967
748 ; , ; State v. Pailet, 246 La.
State v. Christiana 186 So. 2d 580 La. 1966
and the cases cited therein.
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
this court discussed the respective functions of the judge and the jury where a confession is sought to be introduced in evidence by the State and is found to be admissible and is introduced.
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
this court discussed the respective functions of the judge and the jury where a confession is sought to be introduced in evidence by the State and is found to be admissible and is introduced.