Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clifton, 172 So. 2d 657.

24 citing documents.

State v. Singleton 216 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Iigl As a general rule, attorneys barred in the state of Louisiana have a professional obligation to serve and represent indigent clients “unless the appointment is unreasonable and oppressive.” ( , (1965)).
State Ex Rel. Ap 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State ex rel. A.P. 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Wigley 624 So. 2d 425 La. 1993
State v. Clark 624 So. 2d 422 La. 1993
Until today's decision in Higginbotham, , (1965).
State v. Wigley 599 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
[6] , (1965), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a court has the inherent power to require an attorney, as an obligation burdening the attorney's privilege to practice and to serve as an officer of the court, to represent an indigent without compensation "so long as the burden is not oppressive."
In Re Compensation for Indigents'cr. Def. 580 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Bryant, supra; , (1965).
State v. Clark 580 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Bryant, supra; , (1965).
State in Interest of Johnson 475 So. 2d 340 La. 1985
State v. Ferguson 358 So. 2d 1214 La. 1978
State v. Procell 332 So. 2d 814 La. 1976
I , (1965), where we said: "By his motion to quash appellant also attacks the actions of the jury commission in not including on the general venire the names of persons entitled by law to claim exemption from jury service.
State v. Bryant 324 So. 2d 389 La. 1975
III Next, we find it unnecessary to treat relators' contention that uncompensated lawyers are deprived of property without due process and equal protection and are forced into involuntary servitude because, in brief, relators admit that the traditional and majority view does not support them ( , (1965); Annotation, 21 A.L.R.3d 819 .
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
2849 , 33 L.Ed.2d 746 (1972); , (1965).
State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
art. 419 (1966); , (1965) and cases cited therein.
State v. Chavers 294 So. 2d 489 La. 1974
Cf., e. g., , (1965) (syllabus 13).
State v. Fallon 290 So. 2d 273 La. 1974
State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
State v. Scott 278 So. 2d 121 La. 1973
State v. Washington 272 So. 2d 355 La. 1973
481 , (1968); , (1965); and State v. Dees, 252 La.
State v. Washington 272 So. 2d 355 La. 1973
481 , (1968); , (1965); and State v. Dees, 252 La.
State v. Millsap 248 So. 2d 324 La. 1971
866 (1954); , (1965); and State v. Barksdale, 247 La.
State v. Williams 215 So. 2d 799 La. 1968
15:557 (1928) ; , (1965).
State Ex Rel. Barksdale v. Dees 211 So. 2d 318 La. 1968
(1965), and by the United States Supreme Court in Hoyt v. State of Florida, 368 U.S. 57 , 82 S.Ct.
State v. Marks 211 So. 2d 261 La. 1968