DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ballanga v. Hymel, 175 So. 2d 274.

36 citing documents.

  • Reck v. Stevens 373 So. 2d 498 La. 1979
    959 , (1967); , (1965); Winfree v. Consolidated Underwriters, 246 La.
  • Foret v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 293 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Mercier v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Department of Sanitation 290 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    959 , (1967); , (1965); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Adam v. Schultz 250 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1971
    959 , ; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Lovett v. Continental Insurance Co. 249 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Under this rule the amount of damages assessed by the judge or jury should not be disturbed unless the appellate court’s examination of the facts reveals a clear abuse of the discretion vested in the lower court.” , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    963 , (1964); , (1965); Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Porter v. Sprawls 227 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    App., (3rd Cir., 1967); , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Greene v. Allstate Insurance 228 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    963 , (1964), , (1965) the appellate court may review all the facts and circumstances on which the lower court based its award.
  • Davis v. Pena 222 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    959 , (1967); , (1965); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Haik v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 219 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Richard v. Curtis 216 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Price v. Watts 215 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    959 , ; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Thibodeaux v. Travelers Indemnity Company 215 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    959 , ; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Caris v. Reeves 207 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    959 , ; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Miller v. Badalamenti 207 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    959 , ; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Montero v. Gaconi 207 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    959 , ; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
  • Gernon v. Buchanan 201 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    963 , , , , we have considered the amounts of awards granted or approved by appellate courts of this state for somewhat similar injuries to determine whether the award of $4,500 for the injuries suffered by plaintiff in the instant case is either excessive or inadequate to the extent that it constitutes an abuse
  • Manning v. Herrin Transportation Company 201 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
  • Sittig v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 198 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    We further find no abuse of the trial court's discretion in the award of general damages, in the absence of which the trial award is left undisturbed upon appellate review, LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3), , , Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Fish v. Martin 201 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3); Lomenick v. Schoeffler, La., (decided June 5, 1967); , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Desselle v. Wilson 200 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3); , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Newman v. Trinity Universal Insurance 200 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Olds v. Ashley 200 So. 2d 1 La. 1967
  • Olds v. Ashley 200 So. 2d 1 La. 1967
  • French v. Ochsner Clinic 200 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    963 , , , , and confine our review to determining whether there has been an abuse of the "much discretion" vested in the trial court in assessing damages, considering similar cases as relevant only for the purpose of determining whether there has been an abuse of that discretion.
  • Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Considering the great discretion accorded the trial court in the award of general damages for personal injuries, , , we find no such manifest inadequacy or excessiveness in the trial court's award of $25,000 as would justify our increase or reduction upon appellate review.
  • Broussard v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 198 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934(3); , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Clouatre v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company 193 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    963 , , , , we have considered the amounts of awards granted or approved by appellate courts of this state for somewhat similar injuries to determine whether or not the award of $6,100 for the injuries suffered *349 by plaintiff in the instant case is excessive to the extent that it constitutes an abuse of the "
  • Barrere v. Commercial Union Insurance Group 195 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    963 , ; , ; Ourso v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., La.App., ; Davis v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Ayres v. Great American Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Hincks v. Edge 194 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1965); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Clark v. Keller 192 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Jaeger v. Herald 186 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    963 , , , , in considering the question of quantum we confine our review to determining whether there has been abuse of the `much discretion' vested in the trial court in assessing damages, considering similar and comparatively recent cases as relevant only for the purpose of determining whether there has been a
  • Alexander v. Fidelity-Phoenix Insurance Co. 185 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    963 , , , , in considering the question of quantum we confine our review to determining whether there has been abuse of the “much discretion” vested in the trial court in assessing damages, considering similar and comparatively recent cases as relevant only for the purpose of determining whether there has been a
  • Carter v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 184 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    963 , , , , and confine our review to determining whether there has been an abuse of the “much discretion” vested in the trial court in assessing damages, considering similar and comparatively recent cases as relevant only for the purpose of determining whether there has been an abuse of that discretion.
  • Phillips v. Cohen 183 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    963 , , , , and confine our review to determining whether there has been an abuse of the "much discretion" vested in the trial court in assessing damages, considering similar cases as relevant only for the purpose of determining whether there has been an abuse of that discretion.
  • Daly v. Allstate Insurance 179 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    963 , ; , ; Davis v. Cooperative Cab Company et al., La.App.