Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 175 So. 2d 277.

17 citing documents.

Roberson v. Gordon 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
L. Treatise, Workers' Compensation Law and Practice § 59 (4th ed.) (citing Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , (1965); Dupre v. Coleman, 143 La.
Smith v. Matthews 611 So. 2d 1377 La. 1993
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , (1965); Lawhorn v. State Farm Insurance *1380 Cos., (La.
Sam Broussard Trucking Co. v. American Southwest Underwriters Corp. 544 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
See, e.g.: Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , (1965), Youngblood v. Allstate Fire Ins.
Bonadona v. Guccione 362 So. 2d 740 La. 1978
Witherwax v. Zurich Insurance Company 315 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , (1965); (2) Ferguson v. Belcher & Son, 230 La.
Gulfwide Boat Rentals, Inc. v. Security Insurance Co. 292 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , ; Urania Lumber Co. v. Insurance Company of North America, La.App., ; Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Marquette Casualty Co., 5 Cir., 320 F.2d 486 .
Landreneau v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 287 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
3 Cir. 1964), , (1965), and Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
Herbert v. Breaux 285 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
1 Cir. 1960); Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , (1965); (La.App.
Doss v. American Ventures, Inc. 261 So. 2d 615 La. 1972
(1905), in support of its conclusion herein.
Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
399 (1922); Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , (1965).
Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Co., , , 286 (1965), and Speed v. Page, 222 La.
Doss v. AMERICAN VENTURES INC. 224 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
This court discussed and referred to the case of Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , , in which the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the appellate court, and held that at the time of the accident the plaintiff's employer, Landreneau Enterprises, was not carrying on a separate rental business and whatever rental business existed was a part of the total Landreneau Enterprises.
Hall v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 221 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , ; Honeycutt v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, La.App., ; Allen v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck & Company, La.App., 151 So.
Stephney v. Robertson 219 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those found in Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , (1965).
Ponthieux v. Lindsay 216 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Collins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 188 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
The Maggio case, supra, was cited with approval and followed by our Supreme Court in Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , , where a contract of insurance was reformed to show the true intent of the parties.
Urania Lumber Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 177 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Richard v. United States F. & G. Co., , , 287, and cases therein cited; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Kramel, La.App.