Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re LaFitte, 174 So. 2d 804.

29 citing documents.

In Re: Adoption of E.F.F. by J.L.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Green v. Paul, []; In re Ackenhausen, []; So.2d 804 [(La.1965)]; and In re Hughes, [].
In re Adoption of E.F.F. ex rel. J.L.B. 85 So. 3d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
730 , (1963) ]; , [ (La.1965) ]; and In re Hughes, [ (La.App.
In re Washburn 819 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
730 , (1963) . , (1965).
State ex rel. Shroeder 470 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Blackburn v. Barrios 427 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Also, if the payments have been insignificant when compared with the amount ordered by the court to be paid and the parent cannot show that the failure to pay has been with just cause and therefore excusable, the order to support has not been complied with and consent is not required.” Ackenhausen was followed by , a *485 case with facts similar in some respects to those of the instant case.
In re Brunet 408 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
730 , (1963)] , ; and In re Hughes, supra.
Haynes v. Mangham 375 So. 2d 103 La. 1979
(1965); Adoption of Rapp, (La.App.
State v. Jones 373 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[8] , ; In re Ackenhausen, supra, note 6 ; Adoption of Rapp, La.App., ; Steed v. McKenzie, La.App., ; In re Hughes, La.App., .
Adoption of Edwards 369 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
State ex rel. Haynes 368 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Furthermore, in the case of , (1965), the court stressed this language from the Ackenhau-sen case and added the following comment: We think, as did our learned brother below, that “If it were possible to pay up an arrearage in the twelfth month of each year and thereby defeat each effort of the adoptive step-parent to adopt childre
In re Pscenicka 353 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
Poynot v. Pfister 348 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1965); In Re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
In Re Coile 343 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
9:422.1, by tendering past due child support after nonpayment for more than a year, was made in , (1965).
In Re Brannon 340 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
In re Ackenhausen, supra; , (1965).
Matter of Adoption of McArthur 333 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Burson v. Lasseigne 337 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
730 , (1963); , (1965); (La.App.
Berry v. Berryhill 330 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
See also the later case of , (1965).
In Re Salmon 318 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
In Re Stanford 313 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Cantrell v. Talley 291 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
In Re Adoption of Fouts 254 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
In Re Genin 240 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
(The emphasis has been supplied.)" , (1965).
In re Daigle 232 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
730 , ; , ; and In Re Adoption of Moody, La.App., .
In Re State Ex Rel. Sharp 219 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1965); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
In re Adoption of Moody 201 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
In reaching its conclusion the trial court correctly ruled that the recent decisions of the Supreme Court , (1965) and In Re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
In Re State in Interest of Fischbein 194 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
(1965); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
Roy v. Speer 192 So. 2d 554 La. 1966
Green v. Paul, supra; In re Ackenhausen, supra; , ; and In re Hughes, supra.
Roy v. Speer 184 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
In Re Hughes 176 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
See In re LaFitte, Applying for Adoption, No. 47,571 on the docket of the Supreme Court, (1965).