DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cloud, 176 So. 2d 620.

21 citing documents.

  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • City of Baton Rouge v. DiVincenti 697 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    (1965); State v. Robertson, 241 La.
  • State v. Wilson 588 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    ness is satisfied when the language of a criminal enactment ‘has a generally accepted meaning such that a person of ordinary intelligence would be given fair notice of what conduct is forbidden,’ or when ‘the crucial words [or] phrases in the criminal statute have a fixed and definite meaning for a person of ordinary intelligence.’ , (1965).
  • State v. Lambert 514 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    s is satisfied when the language of a criminal enactment ‘has a generally accepted meaning such that a person of ordinary intelligence would be given fair notice of what conduct is forbidden’, or when ‘the crucial words [or] phrases in the criminal statute have a fixed and definite meaning, for the person of ordinary intelligence.’ , (1965).
  • State v. Woljar 477 So. 2d 80 La. 1985
  • State v. Union Tank Car Co. 439 So. 2d 377 La. 1983
  • State v. Farris 412 So. 2d 1039 La. 1982
  • State v. Pearaa 403 So. 2d 1194 La. 1981
    ess is satisfied when the language of a criminal enactment “has a generally accepted meaning such that a person of ordinary intelligence would be given fair notice of what conduct is forbidden.” or when “the crucial words [or] phrases in the criminal statute have a fixed and definite meaning for a person of ordinary intelligence.” , (1965).’ -417.” In the instant case, defendant argues that the term “system of merchandising” is without well-defined meaning and that the definition of “endless cha
  • State v. McCoy 395 So. 2d 319 La. 1980
  • State v. Cannon 383 So. 2d 389 La. 1980
  • State v. Dousay 378 So. 2d 414 La. 1979
  • State v. Skinner 358 So. 2d 280 La. 1978
    191 , (1970); , (1965); State v. Robertson, 241 La.
  • State v. Felton 339 So. 2d 797 La. 1976
  • State v. Butler 331 So. 2d 425 La. 1976
  • Connick v. Lucky Pierre's 331 So. 2d 431 La. 1976
    191 , (1970); , (1965); State v. Robertson, 241 La.
  • State v. Lindsey 310 So. 2d 89 La. 1975
    2d 39 (1969) (language proscribing the commission of any "sexual immoral act" by a juvenile with the assistance of an adult contained in the contributing-to-the-delinquency-of-juveniles statute approved); , (1965) (language in extortion statute approved); State v. Wiener, 245 La.
  • State v. Brown 288 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
    (1965); State v. Cade, 244 La.
  • State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
    (1965), defense counsel has not argued the matter.
  • State v. Dardar 241 So. 2d 905 La. 1970
  • City of Natchitoches v. State 221 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    (1965); State v. Bonanno, supra.