Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Giroir v. Dumesnil, 184 So. 2d 1.

24 citing documents.

C/W 2023-C-01452 succession of Bonny Babin Maloney La. 2024
art. 1611(A); (1966) (“extrinsic evidence is only used to resolve ambiguity, “not to rewrite [a] will or do violence to its terms”); see also Kazan v. Red Lion Hotels Corp., 21-1820, pp. 3-4 (La.
Succession of Bonny Babin Maloney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/25/11), , 258 ; Giroir v. Dumesnil , , 1050, , 6 (1966).
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
RAMELLI GROUP v. City of New Orleans 997 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Id., p. 6-7, 898 So.2d at 1265 , , (1966).
Howard v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund 970 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
Anding v. Anding 859 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
52 (La.1912); Saucier v. Crichton, 147 F.2d 430 (5th Cir.1945); see also, , (La.
Succession of Hackney 707 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Navratil v. Smart 400 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Succession of Brice 390 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
(1966), the court made the following statement with regard to the method to be used in interpreting an ambiguous will: "When, however, the language of a will is ambiguous, resort must be had to all circumstances which may aid in ascertaining the testator's intention.
Succession of Bel 377 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[5] See, for example, Succession of Stewart, La., ; , .
Matter of Succession of Jones 369 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1966); Succession of Smart, 214 La.
Rivette v. MOREAU (ESTATE OF MISTRIC) 336 So. 2d 864 La. 1976
Art. 2286; Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company, La., (1974); , (1966); Quinette v. Delhommer, 247 La.
Succession of Stewart 301 So. 2d 872 La. 1974
(1966) we stated: "When a will is ambiguous, the court uses extrinsic evidence to determine what the words of the testator as written actually mean.
Succession of Waterman 298 So. 2d 731 La. 1974
659 , (1965); , , 21 A.L.R.3d 765 (1966).
Succession of Stewart 287 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-7 (1966), wherein it was stated: “The defendants rely mainly upon Succession of Rusha, 158 La.
Campbell v. Pickering 271 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1966) as follows: “We agree with defendants that testamentary dispositions can be made only in writing.
Villa Del Rey Citizens Ass'n v. City of Baton Rouge 233 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1966); Stoddard v. City of New Orleans, 246 La.
Vignes v. Jarreau 222 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Nevertheless, , , 21 A.L.R.
Succession of Simms 195 So. 2d 114 La. 1966