DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales Inc., 181 So. 2d 36.

47 citing documents.

  • Cajun Conti LLC, Cajun Cuisine 1 LLC, and Cajun Cuisine LLC D/B/A Oceana Grill v. Certain Underwriters at … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    1976); Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., So.
  • McCarroll v. McCarroll 701 So. 2d 1280 La. 1997
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); (La.
  • Miller v. Saunders 645 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    (Emphasis in original) Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Latiolais v. BFI of Louisiana, Inc. 567 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    1976); Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Moreau v. Otis Elevator Co., 531 F.2d 311 (5th Cir.1976)."
  • American Bank & Trust Co. of Coushatta v. McDowell 545 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    (1965); Comment, Parol Evidence in Louisiana, 47 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Hogan v. McKeithen 527 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); (La.App.
  • American Bank & Trust Co. in Monroe v. Vinson 528 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Parlay Enterprises, Inc. v. R-B-Co, Inc. of Bossier, (La.App.
  • SHREVERPORT GR. EMPIRE BROAD., INC. v. Chicoine 528 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • American Bank & Trust Co. v. Vinson 528 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Parlay Enterprises, Inc. v. R-B-Co, Inc. of Bossier, (La.App.
  • Placid Refining Co. v. Privette 523 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    " quoting Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Wike v. Joseph 516 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    See, Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Edwards v. State, Through Department of Corrections, (La.
  • Whitney Nat. Bank v. Palermo 505 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    In holding that this oral agreement had the effect of altering the maturity dates of the debentures the court found the facts to be indistinguishable from two Supreme Court cases, Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Motors Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965) and Goldsmith v. Parsons, 182 La.
  • Robert Inv. Co., Inc. v. Eastbank, Inc. 496 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In support of his admission of parol evidence, , (1965); Goldsmith v. Parsons, 182 La.
  • Land and Offshore Co. v. Martin 469 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965)
  • Waguespack-Pratt, Inc. v. Ten-O-One Howard Avenue, Assoc. 449 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Citing Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Motors Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Goldsmith v. Parsons, 182 La.
  • Distinguished Bank of New Orleans v. HPB, Jr. Development 427 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Scafidi v. Johnson 420 So. 2d 1113 La. 1982
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , at 38 (1965).
  • Scafidi v. Johnson 409 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    10:3-119 to be a repudiation of the following principle found in Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965): “It may not be contended for example, that, as between the parties to an instrument parol evidence is incompetent to show fraud, mistake, illegality, want or failure of consideration, to explain an ambiguity when such explanation is not inconsistent with the written terms, or to show that the wr
  • Dixie Campers, Inc. v. Vesely Co. 398 So. 2d 1087 La. 1981
    White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Moreau v. Otis Elevator Co., 531 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1976).
  • Sloane v. Davis 397 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    art. 2276; Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , ; SnowWhite Roofs, (La.App.
  • Daigle & Associates, Inc. v. Coleman 396 So. 2d 1270 La. 1981
    E. g., Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Carter 394 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    See Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Calvary Tabernacle v. La. Central Bank 393 So. 2d 708 La. 1981
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Calvary Tabernacle v. Louisiana Central Bank 384 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    3rd Cir. 1976); , (1965); Baker v. Baker, 209 La.
  • Fly v. Hand 376 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    (1965), the Supreme Court held that the maker of a promissory note, when sued on a demand note, could offer parol evidence to establish the note was given as part of an oral floor planning arrangement under which the note was not due until a particular automobile was sold.
  • Mott v. Phillips 372 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Edwards v. State, Department of Corrections, (La.App.
  • Gautreau v. Modern Finance Co. of Gonzales, Inc. 357 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Motors Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Goldsmith v. Parsons, 182 La.
  • Texhoma Contractors v. SHIPBLDG. CORP. 337 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    [3] Civil Code Article 2276; , ; Snow-White Roofs, Inc. v. Boucher, La.App., ; Marcann Outdoor, Inc. v. Hargrove, La.App., ; see also Atlas Lubricant Corp. v. Federal Ins.
  • Pittman v. Roberts 337 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The trial court concluded, as noted in his written reasons for judgment, that “the writing is only a part of the entire oral contract between the parties.” In the case of Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted the following rule with respect to parol evidence: “ ‘ * * * Many of the exceptions to the parol evidence rule are quite as well settled as the general rule and require only a mere statement.
  • Franklin v. Evans 315 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , , (La.App.
  • Monsur v. Thompson 300 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); (La.App.
  • People's National Bank v. Duchamp 287 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); and Bank of St.
  • Webb v. Sonnier 272 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    3 Cir. 1969); and Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , .
  • Griffin v. Seismic Services, Inc. 259 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , .
  • Richardson v. French 253 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
    In this regard, see also Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965), where the court found "the rule universally obtaining where an instrument is required by law to be in writing, or where the parties adopt that mode of contracting, is to the effect that parol evidence is not admissible to contradict, vary, or modify such instrument."
  • Edwards v. State, Department of Corrections 244 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , ; Hyatt v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., La.
  • American Creosote Company v. Springer 241 So. 2d 510 La. 1970
    Civil Code art. 2238; , (1965); Krauss v. Fry, 209 La.
  • Martin v. Martin 233 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965); Dorvin-Huddleston Developments, Inc. v. United Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Union Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Grand Co. 239 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    2246, 2275 and 2276; Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , ; Templet v. Babbitt, 198 La.
  • Lakeshore, Inc. v. Sarafyan 225 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    art. 2276: “Neither shall parol evidence be admitted against or beyond what is contained in the acts, nor on what may have been said before, or at the time of making them, or since.” This rule, along with the parol evidence exception, was stated in Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965) as follows: “ * * * ‘While the rule universally obtaining where an instrument is required *19 by law to be in writing, or where the parties adopt that mode of contracting, is to the effec
  • Hyatt v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 225 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    Gulf States Finance Corporation v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • American Oil Co. v. Roland J. Robert, Distributor, Inc. 220 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Civil Code, Article 2276; Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Robichaux v. Pool 209 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Naquin v. Holmes, La.App., .
  • Gulfstates Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc. 208 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Subsequent thereto, the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari and reversed our judgment, thus allowing the defendant to show such an agreement by pa-rol evidence, the Supreme Court’s report being set forth in , .
  • Dorvin-Huddleston Developments, Inc. v. United Services, Inc. 207 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , (1965).
  • Hygrade Investment, Inc. v. Leonard 197 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    art. 965, Plaintiff-appellee relies on the language of the Supreme Court in Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , , wherein the Court said: “Under the express provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, in resolving a motion for a summary judgment ‘all allegations of fact in mover’s pleadings not denied by the adverse party or by effect of law, and all allegations of fact in the adverse party’s pleadings sh
  • Capizzo v. Traders and General Insurance Company 191 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    art. 2276; Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., , ; Snow-White Roofs, Marcann Outdoor