Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance, 180 So. 2d 710.

48 citing documents.

  • Levet v. Louisiana Real Estate Commission 721 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Whittington v. Sowela Technical Institute 438 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    3rd Cir. 1965), reversed on other grounds , (1965).
  • Peters v. Life General Security Ins. Co. 392 So. 2d 1054 La. 1981
    Co., , (1965) this court held that an appellant's failure to perfect a devolutive appeal timely was a jurisdictional defect and could be raised at any time, either by the appellee or by the court.
  • Succession of Buvens 373 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Martin v. Parish of Jefferson 351 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    art. 2088; , (1965); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
  • Blondin v. First National Bank of Commerce 343 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1965), by holding: Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate court can nev
  • Lynch v. Derryberry 339 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Graves v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. 319 So. 2d 323 La. 1975
  • Perry v. Texaco Co. 317 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Co., , ; Enterkin v. Devaux, La.App., ; Auto for Bent, Ine.
  • Reeves v. Reeves 315 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
  • Bardon v. Ledoux 297 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
  • Monsour v. Monsour 295 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
  • Jones v. Starr 295 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Co., 1966, , , to notice lack of “jurisdiction”, C.C.P.
  • Universal Match v. Case 286 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1965); Rousselle v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc, (La.App.
  • Palmer v. Trestman 282 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1966), to supply the closely-related plea that, as recently reaffirmed, Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973), our “jurisdiction”, as C.C.P.
  • Giardina v. Marrero Furniture Co. 282 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1965), we point out that this appeal was not taken within the 15 days “from the date of the order or judgment” allowed by C.C.P.
  • Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons 283 So. 2d 85 La. 1973
  • Lebrane v. Lewis 280 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1965) the Supreme Court stated at page 712: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that t
  • May v. Jackson Brewing Co. 275 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1965), we point out that these appeals were not taken “within fifteen days from the date of the order or judgment” (“relating to a preliminary injunction”) as C.C.P.
  • Taylor v. Morris 274 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Co., , ; ; Thomas v. Reliance Insurance Company, La.App., ; Blanks v. S. H. Kress Company, La.App., ; Britt v. Brocato, La.App., .
  • Krebs v. Town of Patterson 267 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Great American Insurance Companies v. East 264 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • David v. Department of Public Safety 261 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Kinnaird v. Kinnaird 260 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Dion v. Knap 242 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Co, , (1965); and Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority, 250 La.
  • Mike Persia Chevrolet Co. v. Benson 241 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 244 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Wynder v. Wynder 240 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Guillory v. Johnson 238 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Guarisco Enterprises, Inc. 234 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1956) as follows: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate court can *47
  • Moon v. Moon 232 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Untereiner v. Miller, 29 La.Ann.
  • Belgard v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 227 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Defendant cites Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company , (1965) in which plaintiff appellant failed to furnish a de-volutive appeal bond in accordance with the *26 order of the trial court.
  • Levingston Supply Co. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO. 216 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Motes v. Brown 218 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Co., , ), a litigant loses his right to devolutively ap *662 peal unless he takes the appeal and furnishes the security therefor within the ninety-day period set by the quoted Article 2087; both the taking of the appeal and the furnishing of the security must be done within that period or the right to appeal
  • Smith v. Jung Hotel Corp. 218 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Bergeron v. Oil Field Specialties, Inc. 212 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    See Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau, Casualty Insurance Company, , ; Burke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • LaRose v. LaRose 211 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    a recent Supreme Court decision is dispositive of this case: “(1) Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the- failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is ju
  • Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham 206 So. 2d 79 La. 1968
    Co., , , this Court conclusively held: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate
  • Roddy v. Independent Oil & Chemical Workers Union of Louisiana 206 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Company, , , would be decisive of the issue here presented.
  • Tri-City Finance Plan, Inc. v. Barbier 204 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Co. (1965) , as supportive of his contention.
  • Bowden v. Bowden 203 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co. (1965), , , wherein the Supreme Court said “ * * * jurisdiction of the trial court is not divested and that of the appellate court does not attach unless the appeal bond is filed in the trial court within the time allowed by law for taking the appeal.
  • Aetna Insurance Co. v. Robinson 199 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    is dispositive of this case: Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate cour
  • Montagne v. Tinker 201 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    1013 , ; ruling approved, , at 713 , syllabus 4.
  • Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority 197 So. 2d 628 La. 1967
  • Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 197 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • Bulk Transport, Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 5 195 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., , , the Supreme Court stated the applicable rule thusly: “In Lafayette v. Farr, supra [ 162 La.
  • McCrory v. Link Belt Co. 195 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1965), the Supreme Court said: "(1) Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appell
  • Lomenick v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 189 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966