Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance, 180 So. 2d 710.
- Levet v. Louisiana Real Estate Commission 721 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
Whittington v. Sowela Technical Institute
438 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
3rd Cir. 1965), reversed on other grounds , (1965).
-
Peters v. Life General Security Ins. Co.
392 So. 2d 1054
La. 1981
Co., , (1965) this court held that an appellant's failure to perfect a devolutive appeal timely was a jurisdictional defect and could be raised at any time, either by the appellee or by the court.
- Succession of Buvens 373 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
-
Martin v. Parish of Jefferson
351 So. 2d 1316
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
art. 2088; , (1965); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
-
Blondin v. First National Bank of Commerce
343 So. 2d 318
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1965), by holding: Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate court can nev
- Lynch v. Derryberry 339 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Graves v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. 319 So. 2d 323 La. 1975
-
Perry v. Texaco Co.
317 So. 2d 277
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Co., , ; Enterkin v. Devaux, La.App., ; Auto for Bent, Ine.
-
Reeves v. Reeves
315 So. 2d 162
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
-
Bardon v. Ledoux
297 So. 2d 219
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
-
Monsour v. Monsour
295 So. 2d 199
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Co., , (1965); Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
-
Jones v. Starr
295 So. 2d 50
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Co., 1966, , , to notice lack of “jurisdiction”, C.C.P.
-
Universal Match v. Case
286 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1965); Rousselle v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc, (La.App.
-
Palmer v. Trestman
282 So. 2d 558
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co., , (1966), to supply the closely-related plea that, as recently reaffirmed, Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973), our “jurisdiction”, as C.C.P.
-
Giardina v. Marrero Furniture Co.
282 So. 2d 579
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co., , (1965), we point out that this appeal was not taken within the 15 days “from the date of the order or judgment” allowed by C.C.P.
- Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons 283 So. 2d 85 La. 1973
-
Lebrane v. Lewis
280 So. 2d 572
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1965) the Supreme Court stated at page 712: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that t
-
May v. Jackson Brewing Co.
275 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co., , (1965), we point out that these appeals were not taken “within fifteen days from the date of the order or judgment” (“relating to a preliminary injunction”) as C.C.P.
-
Taylor v. Morris
274 So. 2d 715
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co., , ; ; Thomas v. Reliance Insurance Company, La.App., ; Blanks v. S. H. Kress Company, La.App., ; Britt v. Brocato, La.App., .
- Krebs v. Town of Patterson 267 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Great American Insurance Companies v. East 264 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- David v. Department of Public Safety 261 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Kinnaird v. Kinnaird 260 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Dion v. Knap
242 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Co, , (1965); and Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority, 250 La.
- Mike Persia Chevrolet Co. v. Benson 241 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 244 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Wynder v. Wynder 240 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Guillory v. Johnson 238 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Guarisco Enterprises, Inc.
234 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1956) as follows: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate court can *47
-
Moon v. Moon
232 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Untereiner v. Miller, 29 La.Ann.
-
Belgard v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
227 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Defendant cites Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company , (1965) in which plaintiff appellant failed to furnish a de-volutive appeal bond in accordance with the *26 order of the trial court.
- Levingston Supply Co. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO. 216 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
-
Motes v. Brown
218 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Co., , ), a litigant loses his right to devolutively ap *662 peal unless he takes the appeal and furnishes the security therefor within the ninety-day period set by the quoted Article 2087; both the taking of the appeal and the furnishing of the security must be done within that period or the right to appeal
- Smith v. Jung Hotel Corp. 218 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
-
Bergeron v. Oil Field Specialties, Inc.
212 So. 2d 736
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
See Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau, Casualty Insurance Company, , ; Burke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
-
LaRose v. LaRose
211 So. 2d 95
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
a recent Supreme Court decision is dispositive of this case: “(1) Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the- failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is ju
-
Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham
206 So. 2d 79
La. 1968
Co., , , this Court conclusively held: “Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate
-
Roddy v. Independent Oil & Chemical Workers Union of Louisiana
206 So. 2d 114
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Company, , , would be decisive of the issue here presented.
-
Tri-City Finance Plan, Inc. v. Barbier
204 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Co. (1965) , as supportive of his contention.
-
Bowden v. Bowden
203 So. 2d 879
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co. (1965), , , wherein the Supreme Court said “ * * * jurisdiction of the trial court is not divested and that of the appellate court does not attach unless the appeal bond is filed in the trial court within the time allowed by law for taking the appeal.
-
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Robinson
199 So. 2d 369
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
is dispositive of this case: Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appellate cour
-
Montagne v. Tinker
201 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
1013 , ; ruling approved, , at 713 , syllabus 4.
- Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority 197 So. 2d 628 La. 1967
- Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 197 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
Bulk Transport, Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 5
195 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co., , , the Supreme Court stated the applicable rule thusly: “In Lafayette v. Farr, supra [ 162 La.
-
McCrory v. Link Belt Co.
195 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1965), the Supreme Court said: "(1) Albeit there have been some expressions in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal and this Court to the contrary, we consider it to be now well settled that the failure to perfect an appeal by the timely filing of the appeal bond is jurisdictional and that the appell
- Lomenick v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 189 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966