DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lee v. Peerless Insurance Company, 183 So. 2d 328.

16 citing documents.

  • Zachary Zaunbrecher v. Marissa Martin, Jeremy Ponthieux, and Nathan Ponthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    As this Court observed in Lee [v. Peerless, So.2d 328 (1966)], Louisiana has never had a civil damage or “dramshop” statute.
  • Zaunbrecher ex rel. Father v. Martin 242 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    As this Court observed in Lee [ v. Peerless , , (1966) ], Louisiana has never had a civil damage or "dramshop" statute.
  • Aucoin v. Rochel 5 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Applying the duty-risk analysis, some courts found no liability on the part of defendants, generally on the basis that “it is the consumption of the alcohol and not the sale of it which is the proximate cause of the ensuing harm.” , (1966).
  • Berg v. Zummo 786 So. 2d 708 La. 2001
  • Wicker v. Harmony Corp. 784 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Godfrey v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    (1966), the court refused to impose liability on a vendor for damages incurred by an intoxicated person injured when he was hit by a moving vehicle after being ejected from a nightclub located adjacent to a busy highway.
  • Dickerson v. Boom, Inc. 532 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Tullier v. Tullier 464 So. 2d 278 La. 1985
    (1966); Carpenter v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 182 La.
  • Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. Jennings 427 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    (1966) the court held that "no redress exists against persons selling, giving, or furnishing intoxicating liquor, ...
  • Franklin v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana 422 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Thrasher v. Leggett 373 So. 2d 494 La. 1979
  • Thrasher v. Leggett 365 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    The judgment of the trial court was affirmed on appeal 1 with that court relying on a , (1966).
  • Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
    The Court of Appeal affirmed the district court, (1975), , (1966).
  • Pence v. Ketchum 314 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Station v. Travelers Insurance Company 292 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1966): "Pertinent here is the accepted rule that a foreseeable intervening act is not a superseding cause and does not relieve the original wrongdoer from liability.
  • West v. Continental Oil Co. 222 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969