Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, 110 So. 2d 221.

25 citing documents.

Schwarzenberger v. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans 226 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
Rosenblath v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 432 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
F & F TRANSFER, INC. v. Tardo 425 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Peoples Moss Gin Co., Inc. v. Jenkins 270 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Annison v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 261 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Lemoine v. American Employers Insurance Co. 238 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Cobb v. Allstate Insurance Co. 227 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
It was said in Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., , at page 225: “Any loss on earnings or profits from plaintiff’s business occasioned by his personal injuries resulting from the accident may of course be recovered from the tortfeasor or her insurer, if proved with sufficient certainty.
Piediscalzo v. Deutsch 200 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., ; Jobe v. Credeur, La.App., .
Central La. Elec. Co. v. Pointe Coupee Elec. Mem. Corp. 182 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
See also Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., .
Jones v. Rodgers 179 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
1st Cir., 1959), , and cases therein cited.
Laville v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 178 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., .
Bozyone v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 173 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
In Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Co., La.App.1st Cir., , the court awarded $3,000.00 for pain and suffering in recompense for injuries somewhat comparable to those suffered by the plaintiff in the instant suit.
Dowden v. Jefferson Insurance Company 153 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Mercante v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 148 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
3rd Cir. (1960); , La.App.
Anderson v. Adams 148 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
More particularly we refer to Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., , wherein for injuries similar to but somewhat more serious than those sustained by present plaintiff an award of $3,000.00; and to Thibodeaux v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App., , wherein an award of $2,000.00 for injuries approximating those of present plaintiff was held sufficient; and finally to Job
Savage v. Haynes 146 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1 Cir., , 224: “It suffices to remark, without detailed discussion, that we are unable to say from the record that plaintiff’s witnesses showed bias or that their testimony is improbable or inconsistent with the physical circumstances surrounding the accident; and that the factual conclusions of the District Court herein as t
Williams v. Parker 130 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Co., La.App., ; Camus v. Bienvenue, La.App., ; Vest v. State, La.App., ; Rhymes v. Guidry, La.App., ; Thomas v. Stewart, La.App., ; and Dickson v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport, La.App., .
Ledbetter v. Hammond Milk Corporation 126 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Jobe v. Credeur 125 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
1 Cir., , the results of the conclusion were much more severe and prolonged than in the present case; this case is not, as argued by the plaintiff-appellee, authority that the present award is manifestly insufficient.
Fruge v. White 125 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Stevens v. Dowden 125 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc. 116 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1 Cir., ; Brock v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas.
Humphries v. Delta Fire & Casualty Company 116 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1 Cir., , Mullen v. Checker Cab Co., La.App.
Burt v. Fortenberry 113 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Motors Insurance Corp. v. Richardson 110 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
For the reasons set forth in the companion suit of Jenkins v. Audubon Insurance Company, La.App., , the negligence of defendant Mrs. Ogise Richardson is held to be the sole proximate cause of the accident forming the basis of the claim for property damages presented by this suit.