Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sanford, 181 So. 2d 50.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Alcus A. Smith A.K.A. "Bug" A.K.A. "Bull" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Kyriene Vallery La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
1975); So.2d 50 (1965); State v. Anderson, 07-752 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
1975); So.2d 50 (1965); State v. Anderson, 07-752 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Aaron Harrell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
1975); So.2d 50 (1965); State v. Anderson, 07-752 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
1975); So.2d 50 (1965); State v. Anderson, 07-752 (La.
State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
759 , (1968), , (1965) ; the bill of particulars filed in connection with a short form indictment or information, State v. Picou, 236 La.
State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly 195 So. 3d 449 La. 2016
759, (1968), So.2d 50 (1965); the bill of particulars filed in connection with a short form indictment or information, State v. Picou, 236 La.
State v. Jones 525 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
759 , (1968), , (1965); the bill of particulars filed in connection with a short form indictment or information, State v. Picou, 236 La.
State v. Aucoin 488 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Godejohn 425 So. 2d 750 La. 1983
(1965) where this court said: The record in a criminal case for the purpose of considering whether there is error patent on the face of the record * * includes the caption in the case, a statement of time and place of holding the court, the indictment or information with the endorsement, the arraignment
State v. Goodley 398 So. 2d 1068 La. 1981
State v. Cook 396 So. 2d 1258 La. 1981
(1965); and the verdict proper surely includes those markings placed upon the verdict sheet by the jury.
State v. Nedds 364 So. 2d 588 La. 1978
art. 920; , (1965); State v. Toney, 205 La.
State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831 La. 1978
[8] , (1965) we summarized the jurisprudence as holding that the record of the pleadings and proceedings, for purposes of determining patent error, "includes the caption in the case, a statement of time and place of holding the court, the indictment or information with the endorsement, the arraignment, the pl
State v. Egena 347 So. 2d 1106 La. 1977
See, State v. Comeaux, supra; , (1965).
State v. Oliveaux 312 So. 2d 337 La. 1975
759 , (1968), , (1965); the bill of particulars filed in connection with a short form indictment or information, State v. Picou, 236 La.
State v. Craddock 307 So. 2d 342 La. 1975
Some illustrative examples of the record for error discoverable purposes are the caption, a statement of time and place of holding the court, the indictment or information with the endorsement, the arraignment, the plea, mention of the impaneling of the jury, verdict and judgment of the court, , (1965); the bill of particulars filed in connection with a short form indictment or information, State v. Picou, 236 La.
State v. Washington 304 So. 2d 337 La. 1974
33 , (1967); , (1965); State v. Brown, 236 La.
State v. Triplett 285 So. 2d 532 La. 1973
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson 283 So. 2d 210 La. 1973
State v. Luquette 275 So. 2d 396 La. 1973
759 , (1968); , (1965); State v. Bankston, 159 La.
State v. Washington 216 So. 2d 826 La. 1968
State v. Palmer 206 So. 2d 485 La. 1968
Article 920 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits consideration on appeal of “any error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.” This article is an embodir *770 , (1965) where this court said: “the record in a criminal case for the purpose of considering whether there is error patent on the face of the record * * * includes the caption in the case, a statement of time and place of holding the court, the indictment
State v. Brown 201 So. 2d 277 La. 1967
State v. Laviolette 195 So. 2d 270 La. 1967
State v. Scott, supra; , ; State v. Robinson, 244 La.
State v. Willis 193 So. 2d 775 La. 1967
and the many authorities cited and discussed therein.
State v. Sanford 181 So. 2d 52 La. 1965
On the merits of this appeal the issues presented are identical with those found in State v. Sanford, No. 47,875 on the docket of this court and this day decided, .