Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeSage v. Union Producing Co., 184 So. 2d 727.
- Alden v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Co. 197 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Vermilion Hospital, Inc. v. John Patout
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
So.2d 727.” We turn first to address Vermilion’s standing to assert a claim under LUTPA against the defendants.
- Vermilion Hosp., Inc. v. Patout 906 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Michael Joseph Viator v. Wendell R. Miller, Indiv. as in His Capacity as Judge for the 31st Judidical …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
So.2d 727.” The pleadings do not establish that Michael has the right to assert a claim for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress based on misrepresented paternity, even assuming the existence of such a claim in this state.
- Viator v. Miller 900 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- YOLANDA v. Robert 775 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Anderson v. Collins 648 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- Aldredge v. Whitney 591 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
Clingan v. Doughty
491 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
133, 134 , (1971) Erath Sugar Company v. Broussard, supra; , (1966).” *473 At the outset, we note that we fully agree with the trial court that parol evidence cannot be used to prove title to mineral rights nor to prove a claim for or interest in the revenues from a mineral right.
- Bohn v. La. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. 482 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Robinson v. North American Royalties, Inc. 463 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. Crystal Oil Co.
463 So. 2d 860
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
3651, 641; , (1966); (La.App.
-
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System
456 So. 2d 594
La. 1984
133, 134 , (1971); Erath Sugar Company v. Broussard, supra ; , (1966).
- Amoco Prod. Co. v. Columbia Gas Trans. Corp. 455 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- TERRA DEVEL. CORP. v. Southland Dragway, Inc. 442 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Northcott Exploration Co. v. WR Grace & Co. 430 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Curry v. Iberville Parish Sheriff's Office 378 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 711 La. 1978
- Comet Drilling Co. v. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. 337 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Pons v. Pons
327 So. 2d 561
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
.’ ” Here, the petition does state a cause of action, but only on the part of Mrs. Robinson.
- Alside Supply Company v. Ramsey 306 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
-
Bussie v. Long
286 So. 2d 689
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La.
-
Potter v. Brein
289 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
.’ “While in an exception of no caiise of action everything in the pleadings is accepted as being true and evidence is inadmissible in a determination of the validity of the exception, in the exception of no right of action evidence is admissible when necessary and even in order to disprove the allegat
-
Bradley v. Manuel
252 So. 2d 526
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1966) cites the principle of law that “the objection of no right of action raises the question of whether plaintiff has an interest in the subject matter of the litigation.” These declared and (so far as this record indicates) qualified candidates in this special election called in accordance with Lou
-
Saragusa v. Dipaola
247 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Clark v. Physicians and Surgeons Hospital, Inc., La.App., .
- West v. City of Ville Platte 237 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Langley v. Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corp. 233 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
Johnson v. Iowa Rice Dryer, Inc.
226 So. 2d 194
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill, La.App.1st Cir., .
-
Moses v. American Security Bank of Ville Platte
222 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill, La.App.
-
Willis v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Highways
212 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Clark v. Physicians and Surgeons Hospital, Inc., La.App., .
- Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill 201 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967