Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 192 So. 2d 135.

83 citing documents.

State v. Wood 263 So. 2d 28 La. 1972
1024 , (1971); , (1966), cert.
State v. Nelson 259 So. 2d 46 La. 1972
(1966); State v. Neal, 231 La.
State v. Pierre 259 So. 2d 6 La. 1972
Such evidence is not confined to cases where the offense was-committed secretly, but is equally admissible where the crime was committed openly and in the presence of witnesses.” ,, (1966); State v. Neal, 231 La.
State v. Morris 254 So. 2d 444 La. 1971
(1966); State v. Hughes, 244 La.
State v. Dell 249 So. 2d 118 La. 1971
State v. Millsap 248 So. 2d 324 La. 1971
1 , (1966), we discussed this issue in light of Article 60 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in effect at that time.
State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
State v. Hall 242 So. 2d 239 La. 1970
697 , (1970); , (1966); State v. Hughes, 244 La.
State v. Lopez 235 So. 2d 394 La. 1970
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
(oral confession and statements of witnesses); State v. Dickson, 248 La.
State v. Brumfield 229 So. 2d 76 La. 1969
295 , ; , ; State v. Bickham, 239 La.
State v. Wright 225 So. 2d 201 La. 1969
State v. Crook 221 So. 2d 473 La. 1969
(oral confession and statements of witnesses) ; State v. Dickson, 248 La.
State v. Hudson 221 So. 2d 484 La. 1969
State v. Pagnotta 220 So. 2d 69 La. 1969
State v. Pebworth, 251 La.
State v. Hall 218 So. 2d 320 La. 1969
(oral confession and statements of witnesses) ; State v. Dickson, 248 La.
State v. Manuel 217 So. 2d 369 La. 1968
295 , ; , ; State v. Bickham, 239 La.
State v. Collins 217 So. 2d 182 La. 1968
State v. Ahrens, 250 La.
State v. Williams 215 So. 2d 799 La. 1968
State Ex Rel. Barksdale v. Dees 211 So. 2d 318 La. 1968
State v. Washington 211 So. 2d 290 La. 1968
State v. Dugas 211 So. 2d 285 La. 1968
1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 , , cert, denied 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Alexander 211 So. 2d 650 La. 1968
1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 ; , , cert, denied 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Pebworth 208 So. 2d 530 La. 1968
onable belief — or ‘probable cause,’ as it is termed under the federal standard — to make an arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to justify a man of average caution in the belief that a felony has been or is being committed.” , ; See also, State v. Calascione, 243 La.
State v. Chance 207 So. 2d 148 La. 1968
State v. Page 206 So. 2d 503 La. 1968
-on a particular suspect, the suspect has: been taken into police custody, the police-carry out a process of interrogations: that lends itself to eliciting incriminating-statements, the suspect has requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with his lawyer, and the police have-not effectively warned him of his absolute constitutional right to remain, silent * * , , cert.
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
State v. Page 206 So. 2d 503 La. 1968
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
State v. Brown 202 So. 2d 274 La. 1967
easonable belief—or ‘probable cause,’ as it is termed under the federal standard— to make an arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to justify a man of average caution in the belief that a felony has been or is being committed.” , .
State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
4 , , this Court discussed “probable cause” in detail; we find our reasoning in that case applicable here.
State v. Hunter 195 So. 2d 273 La. 1967
(oral confession and statements of witnesses) ; State v. Dickson, 248 La.
State v. Ahrens 196 So. 2d 250 La. 1967
it was stated: “Reasonable belief — or 'probable cause’, as it is termed under the federal standard — to make an arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themsel