Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Collins v. Slocum, 317 So. 2d 672.

28 citing documents.

Daniel J. Saloom v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
record in order to ascertain what his vendor has sold and what it has not, and the vendee is entitled, as between himself and his vendor, to rely upon his deed as written.” In addition, “When a sale is made subject to express warranty, even actual knowledge by the purchaser, at the time of the purchase, of the danger of eviction will not defeat the warranty action.” (La.App.
Spillman v. Gasco, Inc. 110 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
“When a sale is made with an exception to the warranty clause, ‘constructive knowledge’ will not defeat the warranty action.” (La.App.
Gloria G. Taylor v. Conley M. Fuselier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 1973), for its statement that “all persons have constructive notice of the existence and contents of recorded instruments affecting immovable property,” and then explains that a later case, (La.App.
Taylor v. Fuselier 915 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir.1973), for its statement that “all persons have constructive notice of the existence and contents of recorded instruments affecting immovable property,” and then explains that a later case, (La.App.
Brouillette v. Ducote 674 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Miller v. Potier 649 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Huckabay v. Keahey 600 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2506, 2511, 2514; (La.App.
Distinguished Strauss v. Rivers 595 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
*710 The case cited by the succession, (La.App.
Addison v. Thompson 556 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Spalitta v. Silvey 526 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Slocum v. Daigre 504 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
McIlwain v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 499 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Peters v. Livingston Wood Products, Inc. 486 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Crown Zellerbach Corp v. Henderson 483 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
605 *192 (1923); Leon McQueen Lbr.
Sauve Heirs, Inc. v. REYNADU CONST. CO., INC. 441 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Fontenot v. Fontenot 427 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3rd Cir.1974), decision on appeal after remand, (La.App.
Roth v. B & L ENTERPRISES, INC. 420 So. 2d 1094 La. 1982
Harding v. Coleman 407 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
(3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied , 363, 364 (La.1975).
Dunlap v. Red River Waterway Commission 405 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Bielawski v. Landry 397 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Collins v. Slocum (La.App.
LaBorde v. Haynes 398 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Evangeline Farmer's Co-op, Inc. v. Vidrine 378 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Criticized Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp. 350 So. 2d 875 La. 1977
Collins v. Slocum 321 So. 2d 362 La. 1975
Collins v. Slocum 321 So. 2d 363 La. 1975
Collins v. Slocum 321 So. 2d 364 La. 1975
Slocum v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 317 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by