DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boudreaux v. Welch, 192 So. 2d 356.

26 citing documents.

  • Distinguished Winston v. Millaud 930 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Accordingly, we also find that this case is distinguishable from the case before us. Last, , (1966), in which the Supreme Court found that, when a person waives service of process and enters a general appearance before a foreign court, this is "sufficient to foreclose the jurisdictional question of res judicata, " rendering the foreign judgment unassailable.
  • Knutsen v. Prince 911 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Holiday, supra at 516 , , (1966); Allenberg Cotton Company, (La.App.
  • Dunn v. Mortenson 839 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    [8] , (1966), our supreme court found that, when a person waives service of process and enters a general appearance before a foreign court, this is "sufficient to foreclose the jurisdictional question as res judicata, " rendering the foreign judgment unassailable.
  • Ponderosa Associates, Ltd. v. Verret 714 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. D & L MACH. WORKS 643 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    In Allenberg Cotton Company, the Second Circuit observed that: , [1966], has held it is not required that the question of jurisdiction be actually litigated in the rendering state, but only that the opportunity be afforded to litigate the jurisdictional question to cut off collateral attack on that ground in Louisiana.
  • Succession of Bickham 518 So. 2d 482 La. 1988
    This court reached a , 192 So.
  • Andrews v. Racca 399 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    552 (1951); , (1966); (La.App.
  • Glaze v. Glaze 389 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    The Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with a , (1966).
  • Sandifer v. Sandifer 389 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    The permissible extent of a collateral attack on a , (1966), (La.App.
  • Brown v. Brown 387 So. 2d 565 La. 1980
  • ALLENBERG COTTON CO., INC. v. Stacy 384 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    (Emphasis ours) , (1966), has held it is not required that the question of jurisdiction be actually litigated in the rendering state, but only that the opportunity be afforded to litigate the jurisdictional question to cut off collateral attack on that ground in Louisiana.
  • Clay v. Clay 322 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    552 (1951), , (1966), and cases cited in these decisions.
  • Babers v. Babers 312 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    (1966), it was held by the Supreme Court of this State that upon plaintiff's first husband's filing in the record in a Mississippi divorce proceeding, a waiver of summons and an entry of appearance, issue was joined and that such was sufficient to foreclose a jurisdictional question.
  • Berry v. Berry 307 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Tjaden v. Tjaden 294 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    552 (1951); , (1966); (La.App.
  • In Re Williams 288 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    In reversing and overruling the exception, the Court of Appeal (3rd Circuit) , (1966), stated: "* * * that a collateral attack in the courts of Louisiana on a judgment of divorce rendered in another state is not absolutely forbidden.
  • Dubourg v. Dubourg 291 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    The cases cited to support this position— , (1966), (La.App.
  • Hampson v. Hampson 271 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
  • Hudman v. Hudman 259 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
    (1966), the Supreme Court of this state held that where a divorce decree of a sister state is unassailable in that sister state, it must be given full faith and credit by Louisiana courts.
  • Didier v. Didier 230 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1966) we find what has been termed by some as a change in the law.
  • Staples v. Staples 232 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Liebendorfer v. Gayle 217 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Reeves v. Reeves 209 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    (1966) involving a wrongful death action in which plaintiff claimed to be the surviving widow of Carroll J. Boudreaux.
  • Reeves v. Reeves 209 So. 2d 741 La. 1968
  • Robertson v. Cason 203 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    the decree of divorce in favor of Ruth Cason must be considered a valid and final judgment entitled to Louisiana recognition under the full faith and credit clause of the Federal Constitution.
  • Gay v. Gay 203 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967