Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cooper, 190 So. 2d 86.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Lee 52 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    -59 , (1966) (), and permitted reference to the indorsement to clarify the meaning of the indictment.
  • State of Louisiana v. Billy Frank Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    II w/Intent” in that he “did knowingly and intentionally possess and have 1 2 Even if the face of the indictment and the back could be read together to charge murder ( So.2d 96 (1966)), the indictment would still support a verdict.
  • State v. Abney 347 So. 2d 498 La. 1977
    of 1974, Article 1, Section 13): , (1966); State v. Nichols, 216 *501 La.
  • State v. Bolton 337 So. 2d 446 La. 1976
    679 , (1969); , (1966); State v. Weston, 232 La.
  • State v. Lee 331 So. 2d 455 La. 1976
    999 , (1970); , (1966); State v. Knight, 227 La.
  • State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
    1053 , (1966) (syllabus 1); , (1966) (syllabus 9).
  • State v. Birabent 305 So. 2d 448 La. 1974
    *456 (1966), and permitted reference to the indorsement to clarify the meaning of the indictment.
  • State v. Walker 296 So. 2d 310 La. 1974
    999 , (1970); , (1966); State v. Rowland, 246 La.
  • State v. Russell 292 So. 2d 681 La. 1974
    (1966), this Court held: "The argument advanced by defendant is that charging that she did `unlawfully kill' Leroy Fontenot charges no criminal homicide, as the law defines only three killings as crimes: murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide, and to charge that she `unlawfully killed' charges neit
  • State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973
  • State v. Daniels 263 So. 2d 859 La. 1972
  • State v. Gladden 257 So. 2d 388 La. 1972
    1053 , (1967); , (1966); State v. Sbisa, 232 La.
  • State v. Coleman 257 So. 2d 652 La. 1972
  • State v. Shaffer 257 So. 2d 121 La. 1971
  • State v. Nails 234 So. 2d 184 La. 1970
  • State v. Whitfield 219 So. 2d 493 La. 1969
    961 , , .” State v. Martin, 250 La.
  • State v. Bonner 210 So. 2d 319 La. 1968
    Thus, , , we said: “Bills of Exceptions Nos. 17 and 18 were taken to the refusal of the trial judge to order the district attorney to produce an alleged written statement given by a state witness.
  • State v. Johnson 192 So. 2d 135 La. 1966
    See State v. Barksdale, supra, .