DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roy v. Speer, 192 So. 2d 554.

34 citing documents.

  • In Re: Adoption of E.F.F. by J.L.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • In re Adoption of E.F.F. ex rel. J.L.B. 85 So. 3d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • In re C.B. 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
    730 , (1963); , (1966); (La.App.
  • In Re CB, Applying for Adoption 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
    730 , (1963); , (1966); (La.App.
  • Tripp v. Jurls 559 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    (1966); In re Whitten, supra; Adoption of Edwards, (La.App.
  • In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
    (1966); Green v. Paul, 212 La.
  • In Re RLV 484 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • In re D.W.H. 457 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    “Ties between parent and child, being the closest and strongest within the human family, courts sever them with great reluctance.” , (1966).
  • State ex rel. M. 448 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • In Re McK 444 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    (1966); In re Amorello, 229 La.
  • In Re Go Applying for Adoption 433 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Adoption of Vest 427 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Adoption of Edwards, (La.App.
  • In Re Glass Applying for Adoption 424 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    1st Cir.1970); , (1966); Adoption of Bickerstaff, (La.App.
  • In Re CDT 415 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • In re Brunet 408 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1966), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “ * * * The Natural rights flowing from this relationship (parent and child) form the basis for the legislative requirement in former statutes and jurisprudence that both parents must consent before a child can be adopted under the proceedings authorized by o
  • In re Plaisance 394 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1966); In Re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • In Re Ragas 393 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    (1966); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • In re Whitten 391 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1966); Adoption of Edwards, (La.App.
  • Adoption of Latiolais 376 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    1st Cir. 1977); , (1966); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Haynes v. Mangham 375 So. 2d 103 La. 1979
    (1966), because "[t]ies between parent and child [are] the closest and strongest within the human family, courts sever them with extreme reluctance."
  • In re Adoption of Jarreau 373 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • State v. Jones 373 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    [6] See, for example, , , and In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Adoption of Edwards 369 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    1 Cir. 1977); , (1966); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Adoption of Rapp 348 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    (1966); In re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Bertrand v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 333 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • In Re Stanford 313 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    (1966); In Re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Rodden v. Davis 293 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Cantrell v. Talley 291 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    In Re Spraggins, supra, relies in part on the well established jurisprudence that adoption statutes, being in derogation of the natural rights of legitimate parents must be strictly construed in favor of such parents, , (1966); In Re Ackenhausen, 244 La.
  • Adoption of Jones 276 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1966); In Re Hughes, La.App., (La.App.
  • Woods v. Collins 274 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1966) as follows : “Although adoption prevailed among Biblical ancients and other civilizations of antiquity; had reached a high level of development by Justinian times, to whose institutes our civil law is traceable; and was known early in Louisiana under Spanish law, it was never considered an inher
  • Moreland v. Craft 244 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
  • In Re Genin 240 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    (1966) for a review of the history of adoption legislation, including the above statute, and the jurisprudence.
  • Cenac v. Power 211 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • In Re Adoption of Schieman 204 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    (1966) the Supreme Court pointed up the applicability of subsection (3) to a nonresident parent "* * * charged with the responsibility of supporting a child * * *."