Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., 193 So. 2d 779.

32 citing documents.

  • Mitchell v. Gaylord Container 889 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
  • Box v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
  • Box v. City of Baton Rouge 846 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
  • Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 824 So. 2d 1137 La. 2002
    See, e.g., LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); (La.App.
  • O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 758 So. 2d 124 La. 2000
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); Dvorak v. Melvin Jones Framing Contractors, 96-701 (La.App.
  • Tate v. Gaylord Container 720 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co,, , 250 La.
  • Price v. City of New Orleans 672 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    In support, it cites La Coste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Perkins v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 650 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    LaCoste v. J. Bay McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Dempster v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 643 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    section 909 ; LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Hebert v. LOUISIANA DOTD 630 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
  • Austin v. Howard Discount Stores, Inc. 569 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    23:1031.1 A, the Supreme Court in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967), concluded that an employee is "disabled" when he cannot perform the same or similar work as before contraction of an occupational disease, and not until such disablement does prescription *662 begin.
  • McDonald v. New Orleans Private Patrol 569 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , Laurendine v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., (La.App.
  • Casby v. Todd Shipyards, Inc. 477 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In dismissing plaintiff’s , (1967) after stating that plaintiff failed to prove his disability.
  • Duplechain v. Gulf States Utility Co. 468 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2nd Cir.1975); LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Hebert v. Celotex Corp. 456 So. 2d 151 La. 1984
    See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Harris v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 450 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 442 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    1979); LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); 1 W. Malone & H. Johnson, Workers' Compensation Law and Practice § 221 in 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise 468-475 (1980).
  • Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. 411 So. 2d 1042 La. 1982
    This section of the statute was interpreted in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc., , (1967) to deny compensation to a painter and sandblaster who had contracted silicosis but who had not quit working in the same job.
  • Lofton v. Louisiana Pac. Corp. 410 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); (La.App.
  • Laurendine v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
  • Crump v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. 367 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
    23.1031.1 A; LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Hanlon v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc. 358 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    "It is true as stated in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. [ ], [1967], [La., 1976], that in occupational disease cases there must be a showing of disability or serious impairment of a physical function before recovery is allowed.
  • Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 357 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., , (1967); (La.App.
  • Landry v. National Gypsum Co. 354 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).” In the LaCoste case cited by the Court above the plaintiff sought benefits for disability resulting from another occupational disease, silicosis.
  • Brown v. National Gypsum Co. 353 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); Chivoletto v. *428 Johns-Manville Products Corp., La., (1976).
  • Chivoletto v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. 330 So. 2d 295 La. 1976
    LaCoste v. J. Ray Mc-Dermott & Co., , (1967).
  • Vincent v. City of New Orleans 326 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    (1967); writs refused, 246 La.
  • Walker v. Johns-Mansville Products Corp. 311 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    It is true, as pointed out by counsel for plaintiff, that the Louisiana Supreme Court in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967), stated that the disease manifests itself when the employee becomes disabled.
  • Bryant v. Magnolia Garment Company, Inc. 307 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc., , (1967).
  • Marcantel v. Gulf Coast Food Stores, Inc. 300 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1967); Bernard v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission, supra.
  • James v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 230 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The latest expression of our Supreme Court seems to be the case of LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , .
  • Veuleman v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. 223 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The defendant-appellant persuasively suggests, however, that a different legal principle is established by LaCoste v. J. *260 Ray McDermott & Co., , 193 So.