Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., 193 So. 2d 779.
-
Mitchell v. Gaylord Container
889 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
-
Box v. City of Baton Rouge
844 So. 2d 405
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
-
Box v. City of Baton Rouge
846 So. 2d 13
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , -83 (1967).
-
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.
824 So. 2d 1137
La. 2002
See, e.g., LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); (La.App.
-
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.
758 So. 2d 124
La. 2000
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); Dvorak v. Melvin Jones Framing Contractors, 96-701 (La.App.
-
Tate v. Gaylord Container
720 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co,, , 250 La.
-
Price v. City of New Orleans
672 So. 2d 1045
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
In support, it cites La Coste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Perkins v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
650 So. 2d 1198
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
LaCoste v. J. Bay McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Dempster v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
643 So. 2d 1316
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
section 909 ; LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Hebert v. LOUISIANA DOTD
630 So. 2d 318
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
-
Austin v. Howard Discount Stores, Inc.
569 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
23:1031.1 A, the Supreme Court in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967), concluded that an employee is "disabled" when he cannot perform the same or similar work as before contraction of an occupational disease, and not until such disablement does prescription *662 begin.
-
McDonald v. New Orleans Private Patrol
569 So. 2d 106
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , Laurendine v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., (La.App.
-
Casby v. Todd Shipyards, Inc.
477 So. 2d 1256
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In dismissing plaintiff’s , (1967) after stating that plaintiff failed to prove his disability.
-
Duplechain v. Gulf States Utility Co.
468 So. 2d 1386
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2nd Cir.1975); LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
-
Hebert v. Celotex Corp.
456 So. 2d 151
La. 1984
See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Harris v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
450 So. 2d 750
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc.
442 So. 2d 536
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1979); LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); 1 W. Malone & H. Johnson, Workers' Compensation Law and Practice § 221 in 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise 468-475 (1980).
-
Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
411 So. 2d 1042
La. 1982
This section of the statute was interpreted in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc., , (1967) to deny compensation to a painter and sandblaster who had contracted silicosis but who had not quit working in the same job.
-
Lofton v. Louisiana Pac. Corp.
410 So. 2d 1171
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); (La.App.
-
Laurendine v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
398 So. 2d 1220
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
-
Crump v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.
367 So. 2d 300
La. 1979
23.1031.1 A; LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Hanlon v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc.
358 So. 2d 700
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
"It is true as stated in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. [ ], [1967], [La., 1976], that in occupational disease cases there must be a showing of disability or serious impairment of a physical function before recovery is allowed.
-
Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
357 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., , (1967); (La.App.
-
Landry v. National Gypsum Co.
354 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967).” In the LaCoste case cited by the Court above the plaintiff sought benefits for disability resulting from another occupational disease, silicosis.
-
Brown v. National Gypsum Co.
353 So. 2d 426
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967); Chivoletto v. *428 Johns-Manville Products Corp., La., (1976).
-
Chivoletto v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
330 So. 2d 295
La. 1976
LaCoste v. J. Ray Mc-Dermott & Co., , (1967).
-
Vincent v. City of New Orleans
326 So. 2d 401
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
(1967); writs refused, 246 La.
-
Walker v. Johns-Mansville Products Corp.
311 So. 2d 506
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
It is true, as pointed out by counsel for plaintiff, that the Louisiana Supreme Court in LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (1967), stated that the disease manifests itself when the employee becomes disabled.
-
Bryant v. Magnolia Garment Company, Inc.
307 So. 2d 395
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc., , (1967).
-
Marcantel v. Gulf Coast Food Stores, Inc.
300 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1967); Bernard v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission, supra.
-
James v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
230 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The latest expression of our Supreme Court seems to be the case of LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , .
-
Veuleman v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.
223 So. 2d 258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The defendant-appellant persuasively suggests, however, that a different legal principle is established by LaCoste v. J. *260 Ray McDermott & Co., , 193 So.