Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Salemi, 193 So. 2d 252.

16 citing documents.

Carr and Associates, Inc. v. Roselle Jones La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
2d costs which can be taxed against a litigant are those specifically provided for by V ( 1966); Town of Walker v. Stafford, 2001- 2188 ( La.
Brecheen v. News Group, L.P. 105 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
.State Through Dep’t , -54 (1966) (citing State Through Dep’t of Highways v. Salemi, 249 La.
In Re Sanborn 50 So. 3d 1279 La. 2010
875 , (1962); State ex rel, , (1966).
Town of Walker v. Stafford 833 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
ST. TAMMANY PARISH HOSP. SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2 v. Schneider 808 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Cormier v. Roberson 691 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1965), reversed on other grounds, , (1966); see also Lewis v. Macke Building Services, Inc., (La.App.
Bourgeois v. Heritage Manor of Houma 691 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
[4] State, , (1966); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co ., 93-0588, pp. 3-4, 634 So.2d at 50.
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 634 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In this case, the key phrase in this statute is “called to testify in court.” In State, , (1966), a landowner in an expropriation suit sought expert fees for work performed by two appraisers in anticipation of trial.
Collins v. Texaco, Inc. 607 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Rains v. Diamond M. Co. 396 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1980) and State
State, Department of Highways v. LeBlanc 319 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Parish of Jefferson v. Harimaw, Inc. 297 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Subsequent to Moody , , (1967), an expropriation suit, the court held that the fees of a landowner's experts, not called to testify, due to compromise of an expropriation suit, were not taxable as "costs" per the judgment approving the compromise, which assessed them against the state agency.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc. 292 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
3rd Cir. 1966); State, , (1967); State, (La.
State v. Donner Corporation 236 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
3rd Cir. 1966); State, , (1967); State, (La.App.
Trosclair v. Higgins 216 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
We find that the Supreme Court in State, , (1966), as quoted in appellees brief, has settled this question: "We know of no statute, and none has been called to our attention, which provides that the fee of an expert who is employed and paid by a litigant for work preparatory to trial, but who is not called to testify in the case, may be co
State v. Black 207 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968