DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dennis, 194 So. 2d 720.

17 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Brian K. Malveaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    In opposition, wherein the prosecutor commented: But gentlemen I am here to tell you tonight, if you can‟t come in here and return the verdict guilty as charged in this case with the evidence you have, the type of ruthless, brutal crime that you have here tonight in this case, you might as w
  • State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    State v. Lee, La., (1976); State v. Chaffin, La., (1975); , (1967); and State v. Jackson, 227 La.
  • State v. Crumholt 357 So. 2d 526 La. 1978
  • State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
    art. 921; State v. Lockett, supra ; , (1967).
  • State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
    (1967), we held: "Under the jurisprudence of this Court, before a verdict approved by the judge is set aside on the ground of improper argument, this Court must be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks, and that they contributed to the verdict."
  • State v. Mizell 341 So. 2d 385 La. 1976
  • State v. Searle 339 So. 2d 1194 La. 1976
    (1967); State v. Jackson, 227 La.
  • State v. Unzueta 337 So. 2d 1102 La. 1976
  • State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
    This same language was approved in State v. Chaffin, 324, So.2d 369, 373 (La.1975) , (1967).
  • State v. Owens 338 So. 2d 645 La. 1976
  • State v. Lockett 332 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
  • State v. Chaffin 324 So. 2d 369 La. 1975
    (1967), we held: "Under the jurisprudence of this Court, before a verdict approved by the judge is set aside on the ground of improper argument, this Court must be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks, and that they contributed to the verdict.
  • State v. Coates 273 So. 2d 282 La. 1973
    11, 1972), , (1967), "Under the jurisprudence of this Court, before a verdict approved by the judge is set aside on the ground of improper argument, this Court must be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks, and that they contributed to the verdict * * *".
  • State v. Williams 269 So. 2d 232 La. 1972
    (1967), this Court stated, "Under the jurisprudence of this Court, before a verdict approved by the judge is set aside on the ground of improper argument, this Court must be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks, and that they contributed to the verdict.
  • State v. Feazel 267 So. 2d 548 La. 1972
    (1971); State v. Polk, 258 La.