Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Gulf Insurance Company, 199 So. 2d 886.

33 citing documents.

Octavio Diaz-molina v. Walter C. Flower, III La. 2023
Co., So.2d 886 (1967); Farley v. Frost–Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Tarlton Bernard and Addison Provost v. Bfi Waste Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Eric Mark Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 262 So. 3d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
*947 Jackson v. Gulf Insurance Co. , , (1967).
Licciardi v. Licciardi 207 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Yesterdays of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish Sales and Use Tax Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Co., So.2d 886 (1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Mildred Ellen Methvin v. James Thomas McManus La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Joshua Terrell, Indiv. Etc. v. Town of Merryville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., So.2d 886 (1967); Farley v. Frost- Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Justin Douglas Henderson v. Brian Sellers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 4/2/03), : In Jackson [v. Gulf Insurance Co., -91 (La.1967)], the court said: “[a]s a legal concept, the judicial confession is designed to dispense with evidence.
Henderson v. Sellers 861 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 4/2/03), , 390: In Jackson [ v. Gulf Insurance Co., , -91 (1967)], the court said: "[a]s a legal concept, the judicial confession is designed to dispense with evidence.
CT Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc. 861 So. 2d 156 La. 2003
Co., , (1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., , gives the history of the judicial confession principle in Louisiana and tells us what it means.
Scoggins v. Frederick 744 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Davis v. Kreutzer 633 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
199 So.2d *727 886 (1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Spencer v. Spencer 472 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Burton v. Country Boys, Inc. 446 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
passed upon the general applicability of Article 2291.
Harris v. Louisiana Paving Co., Inc. 427 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
(1967): "As a legal concept, the judicial confession is designed to dispense with evidence.
AM. EMPLOYERS INS. CO. v. Honeycutt Furniture Co. 390 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Dunn v. Pauratore 387 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
374 , (1972), , (1967), as follows: "As a legal concept, the judicial confession is designed to dispense with evidence.
Matter of Succession of Vice 385 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Co., , (1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Cheatham v. City of New Orleans 378 So. 2d 369 La. 1979
Co., , (1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways 372 So. 2d 1197 La. 1979
Guidry v. Barras 368 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Co., , (1967); and Sanderson v. Frost, 198 La.
Crawford v. Deshotels 359 So. 2d 118 La. 1978
(1967); Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 133 La.
Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
122 ], this Court pointed out that Article 2291 refers only to the confession made in the suit, that is, in the pleadings, or note of evidence, `for the purpose of dispensing from taking evidence * * *.'" , (1967).
State v. Ward 314 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Co., , (1967); Sanderson v. Frost, 198 La.
J. H. Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 259 So. 2d 882 La. 1972
122 ], this Court' pointed out that Article 2291 6 refers only to the confession made in the suit, that is, in the pleadings or note of evidence, *396 ‘for the ' purpose of dispensing from taking evidence * * ” , (1967).
Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 231 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
(1967), in the following language: "A judicial confession under Article 2291 is a party's admission, or concession, in a judicial proceeding of an adverse factual element, waiving evidence as to the subject of the admission.
D'Amico v. Canizaro 226 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
“It can not be revoked on a pretense of an error in law.” *551 , (1967), the Supreme Court distinguished a judicial confession from testimony and held that testimony is not a judicial confession.
Merriell v. Collins 218 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Treadway v. State Farm Insurance Company 204 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Huisman v. Southern General Insurance 203 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
This argument has recently been answered by the Supreme Court in the matter entitled Jackson, , .