Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nelson v. Walker, 197 So. 2d 619.

16 citing documents.

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson 962 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
(1967), the conduct of the non-concurring wife acted as a ratification of a relatively null partition executed between the spouses when the wife exercised all benefits of the partition, occupied the partitioned property, and contracted to sell the property.
Taylor v. Taylor 772 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
King, supra at 682 ; , (1967).
Unkel v. Unkel 699 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
McAlpine v. McAlpine 679 So. 2d 85 La. 1996
(1967), we characterized, in dictum, the post-separation waiver of alimony pendente lite and permanent alimony as a relative nullity caused by the then incapacity of spouses to contract with each other.
FIRST FEDERAL S. & L. ASSOC. OF WARNER ROBINS, GA. v. Delta Towers, Ltd. 544 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Although Judith Burrus's acceptance of these tax benefits alone may support a finding that she ratified the subordination, see, , (1967) and Alphonse Brenner Company, (La.App.
King v. King 493 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Spencer v. Spencer 472 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Dunaway v. Woods 470 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*578 1966), modified on other grounds
King v. King 390 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1967), the Supreme Court found that the wife's error in waiving her right to alimony as part of the consideration for a partition agreement involving a piece of real property entered into after legal separation was only a "relative nullity."
Monk v. Monk 376 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
The frequently cited decision with reference to a waiver of permanent alimony in a , (1967).
Holliday v. Holliday 358 So. 2d 618 La. 1978
[6] , (1967) for the result which I espouse here.
Clay v. Clay 358 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Meyers v. Faul 349 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Holliday v. Holliday 346 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1967) is controlling on the issue.
Fisher v. Fisher 261 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1967), different results were reached as to whether the nullity was *87 absolute or relative depending upon whether the contracts of settlement were rendered null because they contained a waiver of alimony or because they violated some other prohibition of Civil Code Articles 1790 and 2446.
Thevis v. Thevis 254 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
the Supreme Court of this state, citing Russo v. Russo, 205 La.