Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Andrus, 199 So. 2d 867.

69 citing documents.

State v. Robinson 87 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that incriminating statements made by the accused are placed in three categories.
State v. Fields 842 So. 2d 316 La. 2003
(1967)(“[T]hat the accused surrendered or restored the property to the owner or made payment for it may under appropriate circumstances negative felonious intent.”).
State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In affirming the trial court's ruling allowing the statements in evidence, the appellate court stated: " , (1967), the court noted that incriminating statements made by the accused are placed in three categories.
State v. Byars 550 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Boothe 532 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
(1967), the Court noted that incriminating statements made by an accused are placed in three categories.
State v. Malveaux 499 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1967), the court noted that incriminating statements made by the accused are placed in three categories.
State v. Lee 482 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1967) the Louisiana Supreme Court divided incriminating statements into the following three categories: ...
State v. Beals 410 So. 2d 745 La. 1982
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
1980); , (1967); Comment, Confessions in Louisiana Law, 14 La.L.Rev.
State v. Coleman 390 So. 2d 865 La. 1980
(1967); Comment, Confessions in Louisiana Law, 14 La.L.Rev.
State v. Fisher 380 So. 2d 1340 La. 1980
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Chopin 372 So. 2d 1222 La. 1979
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Hatfield 364 So. 2d 578 La. 1978
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Mitchell 360 So. 2d 189 La. 1978
(1967), this Court, relying upon a number of decisions from diverse jurisdictions held that the fact that the consent was given while the defendant was under arrest does not itself render the consent involuntary.
State v. Schmidt 359 So. 2d 133 La. 1978
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
1109 , (1971); , (1967).
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
Art. 841; State v. Burgy, La., (1975); State v. Preece, La., (1972); , (1967)."
State v. Shivers 346 So. 2d 657 La. 1977
1109 , (1971); , (1967); In accord: People v. Braden, 34 Ill.2d 516 , 216 N.E.2d 808 (1966); Commonwealth v. Young, 349 Mass. 175 , 206 N.E.2d 694 (1965).
State v. Nicolaus 340 So. 2d 296 La. 1976
(1967); State v. Marceil, 248 La.
State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
State v. Nichols 337 So. 2d 1074 La. 1976
State v. Burnette 337 So. 2d 1096 La. 1976
(1967); State v. Marcell, 248 La.
State v. Prater 337 So. 2d 1107 La. 1976
720 , (1971); , (1967); State v. Green, 244 La.
State v. Williams 331 So. 2d 467 La. 1976
1 , (1971); , (1967); State v. Reese, 250 La.
State v. Sosa 328 So. 2d 889 La. 1976
Art. 841; State v. Burgy, La., (1975); State v. Preece, La., (1972); , (1967).
State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
720 , (1971); , (1967); State v. Green, 244 La.
State v. Calloway 324 So. 2d 801 La. 1976
See, , (1967); State v. Melerine, 236 La.
State v. Powell 325 So. 2d 791 La. 1976
(1967); State v. Marcell, 248 La.
State v. Willis 322 So. 2d 169 La. 1975
State v. Square, supra; , (1967); none is shown here, and this bill has no merit.
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
State v. Blackwell, La., (1973); , (1967); State v. Green, 244 La.
State v. Madison 319 So. 2d 912 La. 1975
720 , (1971); , (1967); 35 La.L.Rev.
State v. Suire 319 So. 2d 347 La. 1975
State v. George 312 So. 2d 860 La. 1975
State v. Blackwell, La., (1973); , (1967); State v. Green, 244 La.
State v. Breston 304 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
(1967), this Court stated: "We know of no law which provides that the defendant is entitled as a matter of right to the names of the State's witnesses.
State v. Adams 302 So. 2d 599 La. 1974
State v. Frierson 302 So. 2d 605 La. 1974
1 , (1970); , (1967); State v. Stokes, 250 La.
State v. Vince 305 So. 2d 916 La. 1974
State v. Browning, La., (1974); , (1967).
State v. Brewer 301 So. 2d 630 La. 1974
545 , 24 L.Ed.2d 504 (1970); , (1967); State v. Jones, 249 La.
State v. Kado 300 So. 2d 461 La. 1974
State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
295 , (1967); , (1967); State v. Bailey, 261 La.
State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
720 , (1971) argument by defense counsel; , (1967) instruction to the jury; State v. Green, 244 La.
State v. Blackwell 298 So. 2d 798 La. 1974
State v. McMellon 295 So. 2d 782 La. 1974
State v. Lawrence 294 So. 2d 476 La. 1974
(1967); State v. Marcell, 248 La.
State v. Thornton 284 So. 2d 753 La. 1973
The mere statement of an objection is insufficient; , (1967); State v. Melerine, 236 La.
State v. Bendo 281 So. 2d 106 La. 1973
(1967), State v. Picton, 51 La.Ann.
State v. Rossi 273 So. 2d 265 La. 1973
2d 714 (1970); , (1967); State v. Leierer, 242 La.
State v. Curry 270 So. 2d 484 La. 1972
State v. Bailey 261 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
(1967), and cases there cited.