Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hunter, 195 So. 2d 273.

56 citing documents.

State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
Indeed, other than complying with the rules of pretrial discovery, the state is under no legal obligation to “furnish to the defendant the details of the evidence with which it expects to prove its case.” State v. *734 Hunter
State v. Jackson 926 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(1967); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
971 , (1963); , (1967); State v. Mann, 250 La.
State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
See State v. Frezal, La., (1973); , (1967).
State v. Phillips 343 So. 2d 1047 La. 1977
State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
(1967); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Chase 327 So. 2d 391 La. 1976
State v. Johnson 324 So. 2d 349 La. 1975
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
State v. Lewis 315 So. 2d 626 La. 1975
(1967) our position has been made clear.
State v. Groves 311 So. 2d 230 La. 1975
State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 528 La. 1975
State v. Collins 308 So. 2d 263 La. 1975
*265 (La.1974); , (La.1974); , (1967).
State v. Nelson 306 So. 2d 745 La. 1975
1070 , (1970); , (1967).
State v. Breston 304 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
(1967), and the authorities therein cited.
State v. Frierson 302 So. 2d 605 La. 1974
State v. Sears 298 So. 2d 814 La. 1974
State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
297 , 15 L.Ed.2d 236 ; , (1967); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Lawrence 294 So. 2d 476 La. 1974
State v. Browning 290 So. 2d 322 La. 1974
State v. Gray 286 So. 2d 644 La. 1973
705 , (1967); , (1967); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Barnard 287 So. 2d 770 La. 1973
A request for examination of the weapon, as well as clothing and other physical evidence, , (1967).
State v. Baker 288 So. 2d 52 La. 1973
State v. Finnice 285 So. 2d 187 La. 1973
State v. Woodruff 281 So. 2d 95 La. 1973
The State contends that the information sought by the defendant is privileged and that our law and jurisprudence ( , ) establish that a defendant is without right to pretrial discovery of evidence upon which the prosecution relies for a conviction.
State v. Bendo 281 So. 2d 106 La. 1973
(1967) and the numerous cases cited there.
State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
State v. Prieur 277 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
and authorities cited therein.
State v. St. Amand 274 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
State v. Brevelle 270 So. 2d 852 La. 1972
831 , (1972); , (1967); State v. Barksdale, 247 La.
State v. Ranker 269 So. 2d 812 La. 1972
State v. Bailey 261 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
State v. Bailey 261 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
State v. Migliore 260 So. 2d 682 La. 1972
State v. Cripps 250 So. 2d 382 La. 1971
and State v. Hall, 253 La.
State v. Coney 246 So. 2d 793 La. 1971
425 , ; , ; State v. Pailet, 246 La.
State v. Mitchell 246 So. 2d 814 La. 1971
(1967), this Court stated: “Louisiana was in the vanguard of the states in granting a defendant the right to inspect his written confession before trial.
State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
961 , (1969); , (1967); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Thompson 240 So. 2d 712 La. 1970
The trial judge in his per curiam to the bill of exception treated the motion as one seeking discovery, , *937 (1967).
State v. Pesson 235 So. 2d 568 La. 1970
we said: “Louisiana was in the vanguard of the states in granting a defendant the right to inspect his written confession before trial.
State v. Nails 234 So. 2d 184 La. 1970
500 , ; , ; State v. Cardinale, 251 La.
State v. Fink 231 So. 2d 360 La. 1970
425 , ; , ; State v. Pailet, 246 La.
State v. Redd 229 So. 2d 99 La. 1970
117 , ; , and Articles 841-845 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.
State v. Redden 230 So. 2d 817 La. 1970
State v. Pailet, 246 La.
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
State v. Pailet, 246 La.
State v. Brumfield 229 So. 2d 76 La. 1969
State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Clack 222 So. 2d 857 La. 1969
and authorities cited therein.