Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 199 So. 2d 904.

39 citing documents.

Williams v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No.1 of Tangipahoa Parish 258 So. 3d 584 La. 2018
192 , (1968) ; , (1967) ).
Edwin K. Hunter, Apc v. Thomas Glynn Blazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
181, (1968); So.2d 904 (1967)).
Simone B. Guillory v. Samuel S. Broussard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
181, (1968); So.2d 904 (1967)).
Demetrious R. Frazier v. Luke A. Difulco, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
181, (1968); Kirkeby– So.2d 904 (1967)).
Bailey ex rel. Brown v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 184 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Glasgow v. PAR Minerals Corp., 10-2011 (La.5/10/11), n. 3 ; , (1967).
Bailey ex rel. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 171 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Glasgow v. PAR Minerals Corp., 10-2011 (La.5/10/11), n. 3 ; , (1967).
Renee Christine Dietz v. Superior Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State in the Interest of P.K., G.S. & L.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
unless the grounds urged for dismissal are free from doubt appeals will be maintained.” -872, (1967).
Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP. 70 So. 3d 765 La. 2011
See, , (1967) ("appeals are favored by the courts; ...
Lozier v. Estate of Elmer 64 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Mitchell S. Glasgow v. Par Minerals Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
We find this problem to be resolved by our supreme court’s as it seems to be directly on point.
Fraternal Order of Police v. New Orleans 831 So. 2d 897 La. 2002
Shell Pipeline Corp. v. Kennedy 799 So. 2d 475 La. 2001
Ventura v. Rubio 785 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Fuqua v. Gulf Ins. Co. 525 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Harris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 485 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Jones v. Zumo 479 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
LeMoine v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 478 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dural v. City of Morgan City 449 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jeanmard v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 436 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
US Fire Ins. Co. v. Swann 424 So. 2d 240 La. 1982
Carpenter v. Travelers Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Although an inadvertent error as to which judgment is being appealed will not necessarily invalidate an appeal, ( , (1967); Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 252 La.
Roche v. Big Moose Oilfield Truck Services, Inc. 371 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
(1967) a money judgment in favor of the plaintiff was read and signed on March 25, 1965.
Mirambell v. Lucien J. Caruso, Inc. 365 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
The case is thus comparable to those in which an appeal purporting to be from the judgment denying a new trial was held to constitute an appeal from the principal judgment; Kirke-by-Natus Corp. v. Campbell, 1967, , ; Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio, 1968, 252 La.
David v. David 347 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
341 , (1969); , (1967), (La.App.
Shavers v. Shavers 350 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
341 , (1969); , (1967); (La.App.
Loyacano v. Loyacano 311 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Smith v. United Fire Insurance 303 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
and Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 252 La.
Commercial Securities Co. v. Moye 270 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
181 , (1968) , (1967), the court stated “that where the appellant exhibits intent to appeal an unfavorable judgment on the merits, the appeal will be maintained.
Richardson v. Richardson 264 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1967); Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 252 La.
King v. King 253 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In effect, the court held in Smith, above, as it had previously held in Fruehauf, above, , , that where the appellant exhibits intent to appeal an unfavorable judgment on the merits, the appeal will be maintained.
Walters v. Canal Motors, Inc. 240 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Dyer v. Miller Buick Co. 227 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The Supreme Court granted writs and in an opinion rendered on June 9, 1969, 1 reversed our decision and stated that the facts presented in Smith v. Hartford, supra, , and Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 252 La.
Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 223 So. 2d 826 La. 1969
Accordingly, it held that the matter is controlled by our ruling in General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Deep South Pest Control, Inc., supra, and the appeal cannot be saved from dismissal under the principle favoring appeals which was applied in the circumstances presented in our 1967 , .
H & H Boat Rental, Inc. v. Vidos 221 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
judgment rendered on November 30, 1967, and *831 they further contend that where the petition, the prayer and order for the appeal indicates that they desire to appeal from the final judgment or the appealable judgment of the Lower Court, their appeal should not be dismissed, and they have cited us two very recent Supreme Court cases on the subject, , , and Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 252 La.
Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 211 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio 210 So. 2d 312 La. 1968
it also attempted to differentiate defendant’s error from that committed in the Kirkeby-Natus case.
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio 204 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, and, upon review, our judgment was reversed and the appeal reinstated ( , [1967]).
Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America 201 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
[3] The limited nature of the ruling in this decision is explained in Kirkeby-Natus Corp. v. Campbell, La., (rendered June 5, 1967).