DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Olds v. Ashley, 200 So. 2d 1.

98 citing documents.

  • Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, So.2d 1 (1967).
  • Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. 204 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may oh appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Desoto Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Boren v. ABC Insurance Co. 834 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Plaintiffs, , (1967), argue that the testimony of a witness which stands uneon-tradicted must be accepted as true and that, because DOTD called no witnesses, the testimony of Plaintiffs’ witnesses must be accepted as true.
  • Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Fleming v. Smith 638 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    1977), or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Hopes v. Domtar Industries 627 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Cay v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 614 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc. 590 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Bruno v. Harbert International Inc. 580 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 557 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust v. Smith 559 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that award may, on appellate review, for articulated reason be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Nastasi v. Fejka 556 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    1977); or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Archie v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 543 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1977), or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Ceasor v. Belden Corp. 536 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Naquin v. Hile 536 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Karam v. DeSoto 520 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    * * * * * * "It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • State v. Easley 517 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    However, , (1967), that evidence of witnesses which stands uncontradicted must be accepted as *366 true.
  • City of New Orleans v. Cheramie 509 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Thomas v. State Farm Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Olivier v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 499 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Dobson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 484 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967)."
  • Jennings v. Goldsby 480 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1977); or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Conrad v. Jack Donahue Contractors, Inc. 450 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Olds v. Ashley, *1037 , (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Robertson v. Scanio Produce 449 So. 2d 459 La. 1984
    West v. Bayou Vista, supra at 1147; , (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Beychok v. Norton 449 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Appellant contends since the testimony of these two witnesses is uncontradicted as to the condition of the duct work before the sale, the court must accept this testimony as true, , (1967), rehearing denied 1967.
  • Karam v. Ashworth 445 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Benson v. Seagraves 445 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    1977), or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Hayes v. Hammett Co. 442 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Regarding the question of the accidents themselves, Olds v. Ashley, [ ] 200 S 2d 1 (1967) held that evidence of witnesses, which stands uncon-tradicted, must be accepted as true in the absence of circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.
  • Cummings v. Nixon 442 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    “It is only after [an] articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, Carollo v. Wil *1293 son, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Poynor v. Cure 443 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Stating the testimony was uncontradicted, , (1967).
  • Gardner v. Brown 428 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Cullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Oalmann v. Brock and Blevins Co., Inc. 428 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, Schexnayder v. Carpenter, 346 * or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Gibson v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 426 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Liner v. City of Houma 423 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Turner v. Kentie 422 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).
  • Vallot v. Andrus Homes, Inc. 425 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    (1967); Farley v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., 238 La.
  • LeBlanc v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 420 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, , (1967).