Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, 306 So. 2d 806.

15 citing documents.

Fisher v. State ex rel. Department of Public Education 478 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3 Cir. 1977); Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.
Matherne v. Livingston Parish Police Jury 463 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Id; Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.
McMillan v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 448 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
It is by virtue of the latter interpretation that Malone espouses and Jack v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York, [ (La.App.
Johnson v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc. 447 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Williams v. Pickett Food Service, Inc. 419 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.
Fredericks v. Associated Indem. Corp. 401 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Bell v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. 399 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Patton v. Silvey Companies 395 So. 2d 722 La. 1981
The Third Circuit, (La.App.
Sam v. Standard Fittings Co. 389 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
28:1314, the test is not whether the employer has refused to *794 pay the medical bills incurred, but instead it is whether ‘the employee has been furnished the proper medical attention.’ (La.App.
Patton v. Silvey Companies 385 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.App.
Dove v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 379 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Andrus v. Employers Ins. of Wausau 348 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
629 , ; Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.
Cooley v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Ducote v. Harris 335 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
As we stated in Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (La.App.
Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 326 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976