Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mann, 202 So. 2d 259.

19 citing documents.

State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Defendant observes the State used a short-form indictment, -95 , (1967)(emphasis added): Lit is now well settled that when the state elects to use the short form indictment or information permitted by LRS 15:285, the accused is entitled to a bill of particulars setting out more specifically and in detail the offense charged.
State v. Matthews 814 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
796 , (1969); , (1969); State v. Wilson, 168 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
at 1195 ; , (1967); State v. Owens, 28 La.
State v. Taylor 525 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Wilson, 123 So.
State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
295 , (1967); , (1967); State v. Bailey, 261 La.
State v. Ford 349 So. 2d 300 La. 1977
While the state is limited in its proof at trial by the facts recited in its bill of particulars, , (1967), the bill of particulars forms no part of the indictment and need not be read to the jury along with the indictment.
State v. Gibson 322 So. 2d 143 La. 1975
State v. Miller 319 So. 2d 339 La. 1975
State v. Glover 304 So. 2d 348 La. 1974
State v. Russell 292 So. 2d 681 La. 1974
1974) and many decisions cited therein; , (1967).
State v. Clark 288 So. 2d 612 La. 1974
And this is particularly true [where the offense] may be committed in a number of different ways", , (1967); a description of the offense "`with such certainty as would enable the accused to plead the judgment that may be given on it in bar of another prosecution for the same offense'", State v. Holmes, cited above, at ; information "setting forth more specifically the nature of the
State v. Linkletter 286 So. 2d 321 La. 1973
(1967), with Justice Hamiter as the organ of the Court [2] , the following language appears: "It is now well settled that when the state elects to use the short form indictment or information * * * the accused is entitled to a bill of particulars setting out more specifically and in detail the offense
State v. Welkner 253 So. 2d 192 La. 1971
940 , (1970); cf., , (1967).
State v. Heymann 235 So. 2d 78 La. 1970
State v. Bonfanti, supra; , .
State v. Bonfanti 227 So. 2d 916 La. 1969
State v. Devenow 220 So. 2d 78 La. 1969
State v. Bonner 210 So. 2d 319 La. 1968
391 , ; , and State v. Page, 251 La.
State v. Mann 202 So. 2d 264 La. 1967
The case was consolidated and tried with State v. Mann, No. 48,493 on the docket of this court and this day decided by us, , .