Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company, 205 So. 2d 398.

44 citing documents.

Clovelly Oil Co. v. Midstates Petroleum Co. 112 So. 3d 187 La. 2013
Spomer v. Aggressor Intern., Inc. 807 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Grubbs v. Gulf Intern. Marine, Inc. 625 So. 2d 495 La. 1993
Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co. 575 So. 2d 336 La. 1991
Breaux v. Daigle 571 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Badeaux v. Cook 537 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Heaton v. Gulf Intern. Marine, Inc. 536 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Cook v. Herring 521 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
LeBouef v. Colony Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Comment, Direct ActionsInsurance Contracts, 13 La.L.Rev.
Baesler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 469 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Nevels v. Hendricks, ibid
Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 402 So. 2d 669 La. 1981
Hebert v. Breaux 398 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
1974), aff'd in part and reversed in part
Vincent v. Penrod Drilling Co. 372 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Nevels v. Hendrix 367 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Holtzclaw v. Falco, Inc. 355 So. 2d 1279 La. 1978
Foster v. Hampton 352 So. 2d 197 La. 1977
Our Supreme Court, , (La.
Esteve v. Allstate Ins. Co. 351 So. 2d 117 La. 1977
This court had occasion to interpret the 1950 , (1967).
Foster v. Hampton 343 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Our Supreme Court, , acknowledges the unique metropolitan form of the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge and specifically calls attention to the fact that the office of the parish sheriff functions ".
Hunt v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 345 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Esteve v. Allstate Ins. Co. 343 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1967) extended the application of this statute to suits filed in Louisiana arising out of accidents which occurred outside of the state, provided the insurance policy was issued in the State of Louisiana.
Lob v. Heritage Insurance Co. of America 344 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Easterly v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. 334 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Cambre v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 331 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
The broadest application of the above statute, of which we are aware, , , wherein the Supreme Court held a Louisiana resident entitled to bring a direct action against an insurer if the accident occurred in Louisiana or if the policy sued upon was issued or delivered in the state.
Veal v. Interstate Fire and Casualty Company 325 So. 2d 795 La. 1976
Morse v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company 301 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
The trial court found that since the accident did not occur within Louisiana (as specifically required in the statute), and Hartford's policy was not written in Louisiana ( , [1967]), plaintiffs could not join Hartford as defendant in this Louisiana proceeding.
Grinnell v. Garrett 295 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Romero v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 277 So. 2d 649 La. 1973
(1968) in holding that Mrs. Romero could sue her husband's insurer directly in a Louisiana court for an accident which occurred outside of the State of Louisiana and concluded that Mr. Romero was "guilty of gross negligence or a `heedless or reckless disregard of the rights of others.'" The court furth
Sullivan v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 278 So. 2d 30 La. 1973
Petree v. Crowe 272 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
(1967); Hebert v. Patterson Truck Line, Inc., (La.App.
Romero v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 264 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Finally, , (1968) a wife may sue her husband’s liability insurer in a direct action for damages sustained as a result of a tort committed outside the State of Louisiana.
Kirchman v. Mikula 258 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
(1967) as either: (1) an accident or injury occurring within the state, or (2) a policy written or delivered within the state, even if an accident or injury occurred outside of the state.
Trahan v. Gulf Crews, Inc. 246 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Dauzat v. Crites 237 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
the negligence was the act of a special deputy and, in addition, there was no judgment against the State.
Williams v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 234 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Gant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 234 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
We are satisfied from a review of the record that the aforementioned award of general damages made by the trial court does not constitute a clear abuse of judicial discretion and that the award made in the survival action and wrongful death action is not manifestly excessive, , (1967) — award of $164,412.11 to surviving widow; Owen v. Zurich Insurance Company, 251 La.
Clemmons v. Zurich General Accident & Liabil. Ins. Co. 230 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Co., ; reversed on writs, , .
Overruled Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 218 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
The decisions in Honeycutt , Blount and Nicholson, supra, , (1967).
Gates v. Hanover Insurance Company 218 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
(1967), recovery was allowed for survivors of persons killed in the crash of an airplane owned by a sheriff and piloted by his deputy at the time of the fatal accident.
Verret v. Travelers Insurance Co. 216 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Plaintiff has argued in his brief to this court, as he had argued below, , (1967) and Taylor v. Fishing Tools, Inc., 274 F.Supp.
Pino v. Allstate Insurance 213 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
The case of Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company (1968) , , is cited as supportive of their position.
Michel v. Bahn 207 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
However, these cases have been distinguished, or certainly impliedly overruled, , , and Owen v. Zurich Insurance Company et al., 251 La.
Unruh v. United States Fire Insurance 207 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
But see Mary Estus Webb, Administratrix v. Zurich Insurance Company et al. , , and Mrs. Frances Tucker Owen, Administratrix v. Zurich Insurance Company et al., 251 La.
Owen v. Zurich Insurance 205 So. 2d 410 La. 1967
with which it was consolidated for trial and appeal.