Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal Insurance, 205 So. 2d 35.

69 citing documents.

Canova v. St. Germain 335 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
1st Cir. 1966), affirmed, , (1967); Babin v. Montegut Insurance Agency, Inc., (La.App.
Westenberger v. State, Department of Education 333 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Carson Homes, Inc. 331 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson 323 So. 2d 120 La. 1975
1st Cir. 1966), affirmed, , (1967); Babin v. Montegut Insurance Agency, Inc., (La.App.
Porter v. Travelers Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Johnson v. Banner Corporation 308 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Ascension Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Martinez 308 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Co., , (1967), cited by defendants Martinez, the Court gave a definition of equitable estoppel as follows: “Equitable estoppel may be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is precluded from asserting rights against another who has justifiably relied upon such conduct and chan
Lanasa v. Bancroft Investment Corp. 306 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
American Bank and Trust Company v. Trinity University Insurance Company, et al, (La.
Baker v. Wheless Drilling Company 303 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Cf. American Bank & , (1967).
Stevens v. Claiborne Company 305 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Barnett v. Develle 289 So. 2d 129 La. 1974
American Bank *139 , , and authorities therein cited.
Jones v. Breaux 289 So. 2d 110 La. 1974
State Ex Rel. Re-Lu, Inc. v. City of Kenner 284 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Crabtree v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation 284 So. 2d 545 La. 1973
Co., , (1967) we said: "Equitable estoppel may be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is precluded from asserting rights against another who has justifiably relied upon such conduct and changed his position so that he will suffer injury if the former is allowed to repudiate the
National American Bank v. SOUTHCOAST CONTR., INC. 276 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Faber v. Gay Times, Inc. 267 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Co., , , as follows: “Equitable estoppel may be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is precluded from asserting rights against another who has justifiably relied upon such conduct and changed his position so that he will suffer injury if the former is allowed to repudi
Lake Charles Fire Fighters Ass'n Local Union No. 561 v. City of Lake Charles 255 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In the recent case of American Bank & , (1967) our Supreme Court held: “Equitable estoppel may be defined as the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is precluded from asserting rights against another who has justifiably relied upon such conduct and changed his position so that he will suffer injury if the former is allowed t
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Roger Wilson, Inc. 252 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
471 , ; American Bank & , (1967).
Whitehall Oil Co. v. Boagni 229 So. 2d 702 La. 1969